Re: server-to-server protocols

Ted Lemon <> Sat, 12 April 1997 00:06 UTC

Received: from cnri by id aa23253; 11 Apr 97 20:06 EDT
Received: from by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22901; 11 Apr 97 20:06 EDT
Received: from by; (5.65v3.2/ id AA28684; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:33:45 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:33:45 -0400
Message-Id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: Ted Lemon <>
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: server-to-server protocols
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4

> The fundamental question that I am asking is 'Just what is the nature of 
> what the server-to-server protocol is trying to accomplish?'  In particular, 
> are we attempting to synchronize binding information (alone) among servers, 
> or are we attempting to enable one server to take-over from another by 
> synchronizing configuration information?

Gosh, I *really* hope that we aren't going to try to go beyond
synchronizing binding information.   I'd really like to have the DHCP
Interserver Protocol (DIP :') working before the new millenium.