BOOTP clients with DHCP 'pool' functionality....?

Justin Clark - Integralis UK <ipng@integralis.com> Fri, 11 April 1997 11:18 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11442; 11 Apr 97 7:18 EDT
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07810; 11 Apr 97 7:18 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM) id AA27482; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 07:10:07 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 07:10:07 -0400
Message-Id: <334E1729.471CFD1A@integralis.com>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Justin Clark - Integralis UK <ipng@integralis.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: BOOTP clients with DHCP 'pool' functionality....?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b3 [en] (WinNT; I)

We are planning to provide BOOTP clients (those that do not have an
upgrade path to DHCP) with addresses from our DHCP servers pool -
providing we write support for this in our server.

We accept that Lease times cannot be supported and that the BOOTP client
will request an address on every bootup (i.e have no past knowledge of
address allocation).

Only problem is that if the dhcp server does not have any past knowledge
of address allocation then we will quickly run out of addresses because
each reboot requests a new address!

So the plan is to *build* a 'static' table of MAC/IP pairs within our
server based on the first address allocations for each system.....

The idea is that when a bootp client reboots and requests 'another'
address, the dhcp server should browse through it's cache (memory or
from disk) of previously-allocated addresses and realise that the bootp
client needs the address that the server allocated previously.

I have a couple of questions to pose to the group:

1> Any fundamental flaws in this?

2> Can the static/dynamic table be in memory cache or should it be
committed to disk?

4> Are there any commercial or shareware vendors providing such a
capability? i.e a large corporate doesn't need to build a MAC/IP address
pair table for each client - the server dynamically builds the table
based on first allocations?

Kind regards


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Justin Clark
 Product Management
 INTEGRALIS
 Theale, Berkshire, UK
 Tel: +44 (0)1189 306060
 Fax: +44 (0)1189 302143
 Email: justin.clark@integralis.com