IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 04 December 1996 23:38 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa08591; 4 Dec 96 18:38 EST
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24822; 4 Dec 96 18:38 EST
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM) id AA08106; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:18:35 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:18:35 -0500
Message-Id: <199612042223.OAA10859@toccata.fugue.com>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4

> This sounds like a perfectly acceptable solution to me.  Only one minor
> question: do we want to say "UDP" instead of "TCP" in that clause?  Other
> than that, I say let's go for it...

Oops.   I've been doing more TCP than UDP hacking lately, and it just
came out wrong.   :'(   I did indeed mean UDP.

			       _MelloN_

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email