IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: server-to-server protocols

"Hibbs, R Barr (rbhibbs)" <rbhibbs@pbsrv02.isp.pacbell.com> Tue, 15 April 1997 23:35 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa15137; 15 Apr 97 19:35 EDT
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23228; 15 Apr 97 19:35 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM) id AA10157; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:29:47 -0400
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:29:47 -0400
Message-Id: <9704152305.AA13116@ns.PacBell.COM>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "Hibbs, R Barr (rbhibbs)" <rbhibbs@pbsrv02.isp.pacbell.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: server-to-server protocols
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
X-Mailer: Worldtalk (NetConnex V4.00a)/MIME


At 3:16 p.m. on 4/15/97, Kim wrote:

>Before we get into the meat of the issue, does anyone think we should
>move this to the server-server mailing list?

Now that we've announced the discussion thread, perhaps we should move to 
dhcp-serve.

I especially would like Erikas to join the discussion, as his comments in 
Memphis regarding the use of SNMP to read and set configuration data suggest 
another mechanism that might be useful (as an adjunct to the protocol which 
distributes binding data, for example).  Because of his interest in 
extending CMU's proposed DHCP MIB, I would hope Pratik might also 
participate.

 --Barr Hibbs
  Pacific*Bell

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email