Re: Default Gateways
Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk> Thu, 29 February 1996 11:42 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10014;
29 Feb 96 6:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10010;
29 Feb 96 6:42 EST
Received: from coral.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04687;
29 Feb 96 6:42 EST
Received: from charcoal-gw.eg.bucknell.edu by coral.bucknell.edu;
(5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/29Aug94-0956AM)
id AA12546; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:24:27 -0500
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by charcoal (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA21940; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:12:44 -0500
Received: from io.salford.ac.uk by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA27564; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:12:40 -0500
Message-Id: <9602291112.AA27564@reef.bucknell.edu>
Received: from salford.ac.uk by io.salford.ac.uk id <05299-0@io.salford.ac.uk>;
Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:44:27 +0000
Subject: Re: Default Gateways
To: bclark@ccmailpc.ctron.com
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:44:20 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: munils@microsoft.com, dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu, pradeepb@microsoft.com
In-Reply-To: <9601288255.AA825533955@ccmailpc.ctron.com> from
"bclark@ccmailpc.ctron.com" at Feb 28, 96 10:59:15 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk>
X-Orig-Sender: R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk
bclark@ccmailpc.ctron.com wrote.... > > Many of our customers use an intermix of class c subnet structures to > help manage their workgroups. With only 255 host available in each > class c subnet, multiple subnets are obviously needed. Because the > network is flat they need to have every DHCP client use itself as a > default gateway so that they can talk to other clients. > > In summary, we have customers using flat networks, different subnets, > no routers, and are experiencing communication problems because DHCP > (under NT) doesn't support default gateways. > what happens if you specify a subnetmask that is actually a supernet mask? eg 0.0.0.0 or 128.0.0.0 unfortunately the TCPIP stack I'm using on my PC does not permit me to set the subnet mask to be larger than the class-B network mask for the 146.87 network, nor larger than a class-c subnet mask for 192.65.172. if you can tell the IP stack that it is connected to a supernet network with no routers on it you can rely on proxy-arp or BUS-arp to bind the ip address to a lan address. [as an experiment I can set the netmask of our solaris systems to 128.0.0.0 and delete all the routes out of the routing table, and it still communicates on our routed environment] Richard Letts ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Manager mail: R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk University of Salford phone: +44 161 745 5252 Great Britain fax: +44 161 745 5888
- Re: Default Gateways bclark
- Re[2]: Default Gateways bclark
- RE: Default Gateways Munil Shah
- Re: Default Gateways Richard Letts