Re: Default Gateways

Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk> Thu, 29 February 1996 11:42 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10014; 29 Feb 96 6:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10010; 29 Feb 96 6:42 EST
Received: from coral.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04687; 29 Feb 96 6:42 EST
Received: from charcoal-gw.eg.bucknell.edu by coral.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/29Aug94-0956AM) id AA12546; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:24:27 -0500
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by charcoal (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA21940; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:12:44 -0500
Received: from io.salford.ac.uk by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA27564; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:12:40 -0500
Message-Id: <9602291112.AA27564@reef.bucknell.edu>
Received: from salford.ac.uk by io.salford.ac.uk id <05299-0@io.salford.ac.uk>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:44:27 +0000
Subject: Re: Default Gateways
To: bclark@ccmailpc.ctron.com
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:44:20 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: munils@microsoft.com, dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu, pradeepb@microsoft.com
In-Reply-To: <9601288255.AA825533955@ccmailpc.ctron.com> from "bclark@ccmailpc.ctron.com" at Feb 28, 96 10:59:15 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk>
X-Orig-Sender: R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk

bclark@ccmailpc.ctron.com wrote....
> 
>      Many of our customers use an intermix of class c subnet structures to 
>      help manage their workgroups. With only 255 host available in each 
>      class c subnet, multiple subnets are obviously needed. Because the 
>      network is flat they need to have every DHCP client use itself as a 
>      default gateway so that they can talk to other clients. 
>      
>      In summary, we have customers using flat networks, different subnets, 
>      no routers, and are experiencing communication problems because DHCP 
>      (under NT) doesn't support default gateways. 
>      
what happens if you specify a subnetmask that is actually a supernet mask?
eg 0.0.0.0 or 128.0.0.0

unfortunately the TCPIP stack I'm using on my PC does not permit me to set the
subnet mask to be larger than the class-B network mask for the 146.87 network,
nor larger than a class-c subnet mask for 192.65.172.

if you can tell the IP stack that it is connected to a supernet network with
no routers on it you can rely on proxy-arp or BUS-arp to bind the ip address
to a lan address.

[as an experiment I can set the netmask of our solaris systems to 128.0.0.0
and delete all the routes out of the routing table, and it still communicates
on our routed environment]

Richard Letts  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Manager                               mail:    R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk  
University of Salford                         phone:     +44 161 745 5252
Great Britain                                 fax:       +44 161 745 5888