Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 10 December 1996 00:50 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa22010; 9 Dec 96 19:50 EST
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23693;
9 Dec 96 19:50 EST
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu;
(5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM)
id AA16821; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:33:45 -0500
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:33:45 -0500
Message-Id: <199612092316.PAA06409@toccata.fugue.com>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
> How much of a problem is this really? The server implementation I was > responsible for had to handle multiple interfaces, and it did so just > fine. The server kept a list of all of its own IP addresses. When a > DHCPREQUEST comes in with a Server Identifier option specified, we ran > down the list and compared it - if it was on the list, it's ours; if > not, it isn't. Unless there's a DHCP server with hundreds of interfaces > out there, running down the list shouldn't take all that long... Actually, now that I think about it, the reason I didn't want to do this is that I didn't want dhcpd to fail to recognize a lease as its own if some of the server's interface addresses changed. By requiring the user to pick one server identifier address, and documenting the importance of choosing a reasonably permanent address, rather than assigning these addresses automatically, I felt I was minimizing the chances of something like this happening. Nonetheless, I think this is a moot point for reasons we have already discussed. Sigh. _MelloN_
- NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Tim Rowe
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Tim Rowe
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ken Key
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Shawn Mamros
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Matt Crawford
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Shawn Mamros
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ken Key
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ralph Droms
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Don Coolidge
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Mike Carney - SunSoft Internet Engineering
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Kim Kinnear
- RE: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Pratik Gupta
- RE: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Pratik Gupta
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Shawn Mamros
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Shawn Mamros
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ken Key
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address David Lapp
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ken Key
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address John M. Wobus
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Shawn Mamros
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ralph Droms
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address David Lapp
- Re: NT 3.51 dhcp client and server ip address Ted Lemon