Re: DHCP and Multipule IP subnets
"Michael J. Lewis" <hosmjl@chevron.com> Tue, 16 April 1996 22:48 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24830;
16 Apr 96 18:48 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24826;
16 Apr 96 18:48 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17066;
16 Apr 96 18:48 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23895; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 18:46:49 -0400
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 18:46:49 -0400
Message-Id: <317417BA.FF1@chevron.com>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Michael J. Lewis" <hosmjl@chevron.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: DHCP and Multipule IP subnets
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
We've tested NT DHCP on a multi-homed server (Ethernet and Token Ring) without difficulty. We have not tested with VLANs. The only trouble we had was that when we put in the second card, routing was enabled on one card and not the other. This produced some wierd TCP/IP behavior and prevented DHCP from working on the Token Ring side. Disabling routing on both cards allowed DHCP to work correctly. As far as defining scopes, one simply defines one per segment. Regarding VLANs, I've read that setting your VLAN by IP address is incompatible with DHCP because the workstation is unable to determine which LAN to join if it doesn't have a TCP/IP address at start up. Arlen Ahl wrote: > > I'm new to this list and to implementing DHCP so forgive me if this is a > lame question. We are implementing Virtual Lans and plan to use DHCP from > an NT server v 3.51 to multiple VLAN's and also provide WINS (&maybe DNS) > from the same server. We didn't want to serve the DHCP and WINS through the > router though. What we want to do is put multiple NIC's in the NT server > doing DHCP and WINs, and have one machine connected to each VLAN (subnet). > Has anyone tried this? Is it feasible? What would the limitations be? > How would you define the scopes for different interfaces? > > Any comments/suggestions are aprreciated. > > Arlen Ahl > aahl@ball.com > Ball Corporation
- Re: DHCP and Multipule IP subnets Arlen Ahl
- Re: DHCP and Multipule IP subnets Michael J. Lewis