Re: dhcp multiple server

dhock@dns2.noc.best.net Fri, 09 August 1996 02:57 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa01103; 8 Aug 96 22:57 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa01099; 8 Aug 96 22:57 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18879; 8 Aug 96 22:57 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA28406; Thu, 8 Aug 1996 22:51:15 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 22:51:15 -0400
Message-Id: <Chameleon.839558438.dhock@dhock-laptop>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: dhock@dns2.noc.best.net
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: dhcp multiple server
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Chameleon 5.0, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc.

Allen / Charles,

And whats wrong with the Wzlist <grin>?

Seriously, there are several issues surrounding the multiple/backup DHCP 
server concept. We have been completing a comparison of differing methods 
and their respective adv/disadv. for a client. 

Let me know if  you want me to send some of the results....
===============================================
David Hockenberry     Int'l Network Services
dhock@best.com    OR  david_hockenberry@ins.com
===============================================