DHCPDECLINE doubt...
Rajesh Saluja <rsaluja@wipinfo.soft.net> Thu, 28 March 1996 10:38 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13443;
28 Mar 96 5:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13439;
28 Mar 96 5:38 EST
Received: from coral.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03922;
28 Mar 96 5:38 EST
Received: from charcoal-gw.eg.bucknell.edu by coral.bucknell.edu;
(5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/29Aug94-0956AM)
id AA15415; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 05:38:15 -0500
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by charcoal (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA13995; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 05:32:59 -0500
Received: from s.wipinfo.soft.net by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA01176; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 05:32:54 -0500
Received: by s.wipinfo.soft.net (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA23766; Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:08:13 IST
Received: from comm10 by rolex.rnd.blr (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA19388; Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:07:45+050
Received: (from rsaluja@localhost) by comm10 (8.6.12/8.6.9) id QAA17785 for
dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 16:03:42 +0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Rajesh Saluja <rsaluja@wipinfo.soft.net>
Message-Id: <199603281103.QAA17785@comm10>
Subject: DHCPDECLINE doubt...
To: DHCP MAILING LIST <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 16:03:40 +0500 (GMT+0500)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-06.txt, in section 4.4.4, it is mentioned that the client unicasts DHCPDECLINE message. I feel that it is not correct. In DHCPDECLINE, the source address will be zero (client will still be unconfigured) then if the server is not on the local net, how will the client be able to unicast the message to the server? I think that it should be broadcast. Any thoughts??? Best regards Rajesh
- DHCPDECLINE doubt... Rajesh Saluja
- Re: DHCPDECLINE doubt... KEY
- Re: DHCPDECLINE doubt... Ralph Droms