Re: dhcpdecline
Rajesh Saluja <rsaluja@wipinfo.soft.net> Tue, 09 April 1996 04:16 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06477;
9 Apr 96 0:16 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06473;
9 Apr 96 0:16 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01159;
9 Apr 96 0:16 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA03426; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 00:03:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 00:03:07 -0400
Message-Id: <199604090407.JAA21676@comm10>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Rajesh Saluja <rsaluja@wipinfo.soft.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: dhcpdecline
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Allen Lung writes: > > I noticed in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-06.txt under the message dhcpdecline that > the client declines because the address in already in use. How does the > client determine this ? The client determines this by broadcasting an ARP request on the net. The client puts 0.0.0.0 as the source IP address and the address obtained from the DHCPACK message as the target address in the ARPREQUEST packet. If ARPREPLY comes, address is already in use otherwise address is unique.
- dhcpdecline Allen Lung
- Re: dhcpdecline Rajesh Saluja