Re: Server NAKs
Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software <mwc@poori.east.sun.com> Tue, 11 June 1996 17:27 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20495;
11 Jun 96 13:27 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20491;
11 Jun 96 13:27 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14571;
11 Jun 96 13:27 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA16238; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 13:19:58 -0400
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 13:19:58 -0400
Message-Id: <9606111707.AA21124@poori.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software <mwc@poori.east.sun.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: Server NAKs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Pronto E-Mail [Ver 2.1 (0603)]
> Question: Should a server on subnet "A" that is servicing another > subnet "B" NAK invalid requests on subnet "A"? > > We have a subnet 192 on which there are two DHCP servers. One services > the 192 subnet and the other another external subnet 12. The second > server, which has no definition of the 192 subnet in its tables, issues > NAKs whenever it detected an improper address for the 192 subnet. > > This seems to conform to the RFC but I wanted to verify with the working > group. > Yes, this behavior is correct, as per the RFC> Mike Carney SunSoft PC Networking Chelmsford, MA
- Server NAKs Michael J. Lewis
- Re: Server NAKs Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software