Re: Minimum lease time
Ralph Droms <droms@bucknell.edu> Sat, 10 February 1996 04:40 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00551;
9 Feb 96 23:40 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00546;
9 Feb 96 23:40 EST
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00544;
9 Feb 96 23:40 EST
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA14856; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:04:35 -0500
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:04:35 -0500
Message-Id: <v02120d3ead41bc9349dc@[134.82.7.158]>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ralph Droms <droms@bucknell.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: Minimum lease time
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
At 2:59 PM 2/9/96, Andy Schweig wrote: >I just noticed that the specification of a minimum lease value (1 hour) >that appeared in RFC 1541 isn't in any of the drafts. Yeah, we dropped the one hour minimum soon after RFC 1541. There didn't seem to be any good reason to specify that limitation... - Ralph
- Re: Minimum lease time Ralph Droms