Re: Query on DHCP-to-DNS communications

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Wed, 02 October 1996 21:39 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id al08783; 2 Oct 96 17:39 EDT
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20903; 2 Oct 96 16:45 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM) id AA11025; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:33:56 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:33:56 -0400
Message-Id: <199610021852.LAA07255@hubbub.cisco.com>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: Query on DHCP-to-DNS communications
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4

Folks,

> I would like to replace this text in the DHCP FAQ:
> 
> > 11. Can a DHCP client update its DNS entry through DHCP?
> >
> >     No. There has been some discussion about adding this ability to DHCP.
> 
> Here is my draft for the question and answer to replace this:
> 
> > 11. Can a DHCP client or server make a DNS server update the the
> >     client's DNS entry to match the client's dynamically assigned
> >     address?
> >
> >     There is no standard DNS interface to allow a DHCP client or
> >     server to do this, but there are presently efforts to define such
> >     a standard.  In the mean time, there are DNS and DHCP servers
> >     that accomplish this through proprietary means.
> 
> I have written this so as to beg the question as to whether the DNS
> will receive its information from the DHCP server, or from the DHCP
> client.  My questions:
> 
> a) Has my clever phrasing left out a possible method that is receiving
>    consideration?
>    (The DNS server could poll the DHCP server once a second; or the
>     DHCP client could kick the DNS server to ask the DHCP server for
>     the current address; these ideas seem kooky to me, but I mention
>     them because they do show that things could be accomplished in
>     other ways)
> 
> b) Am I right in framing this as a "DNS enhancement"?  I.e., a standard
>    interface will be added to the DNS, then the DHCP developers will
>    implement it.
> 
> c) Is there more specific information that I could add?  E.g. perhaps
>    it is now clear that the communication in question will be between
>    the DHCP server and the DNS server.  (I seem to recall that IBM's
>    solution was to have the client update the name & the server update
>    the address)

There is an Internet Draft that describes DHCP-DNS interaction
(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt).

Yakov.