Re: "Renew" in Win95
"Michael J. Lewis" <hosmjl@chevron.com> Thu, 29 February 1996 00:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06473;
28 Feb 96 19:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06463;
28 Feb 96 19:52 EST
Received: from coral.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17588;
28 Feb 96 19:52 EST
Received: from charcoal-gw.eg.bucknell.edu by coral.bucknell.edu;
(5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/29Aug94-0956AM)
id AA23330; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:38:46 -0500
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by charcoal (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA18316; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:28:23 -0500
Received: from portal.chevron.com by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA02677; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:28:20 -0500
Received: by portal.chevron.com id AA07587
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu);
Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:28:17 -0800
Received: by portal.chevron.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:28:17 -0800
Message-Id: <3134F2F1.6836@chevron.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:27:29 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Michael J. Lewis" <hosmjl@chevron.com>
Organization: Chevron
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Ralph Droms <droms@reef.bucknell.edu>
Cc: fred@speedster.ca.boeing.com, dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Subject: Re: "Renew" in Win95
References: <9602282232.AA22991@reef.bucknell.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The "Renew" button in Windows 95 will unicast a DHCPREQUEST packet to extend an existing lease. It looks just like a T1 DHCPREQUEST packet in a packet trace and places the address in the 'ciaddr' not 'giaddr' field. As long as the originating server is in place (at the same address), the button will work correctly resulting in the lease being extended. This has been tested at our site with multiple servers (Microsoft's, Competitive Automation JOIN (Solaris/SunOS), and a couple of NetWare based servers.) The "Renew" button can exhibit different behavior in some cases. If the client currently has no lease, then the "Renew" buttom actually will broadcast a DHCPDISCOVER for a new address. In cases when a lease is still active but the server is down, "Renew" can report a "Server Unavailable" condition. This situation can also occur occasionally if a lease is allowed to truly expire. We haven't tested much across subnets. There should be no reason to utilize the renew button in normal operations as the lease should renew on its own. The only time we've used it here is in testing various combinations of clients and servers so that we can trace what a client really does at the T1/T2 times.
- Re: "Renew" in Win95 Ralph Droms
- Re: "Renew" in Win95 Michael J. Lewis