IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 23 February 2016 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82C41B2FB9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isvRs_Lwa6QF for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B641B2FC2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id h129so147433158ywb.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=G4ahw32h/+veguOBGYF/w74Hvv+hdV67SEu6ZUz3ns0=; b=jBtxai3Y3lq3+2AmZ3G3tmjBHqmATmRcIlv6WBhToq5db7LqPLHVUcryXyW3fhI49J bUGg7R5KydNQBrVHNJctKhpjm/lA8dJUO7wO2QFJkiNftEvN+AcSNHktY6Zrk3XOUrm2 GfMCj6n//a9ikDzzA/FdpI9DiOlxxSQqtaCeJdkAiub3zzuv5ylTqsIamWSMfiRMLhv9 0wfMP/tGurBbbgbtwmo/sU1k4ceCKHFIDTW6f6TtMBVgeIqVP7NqTEu9dD4nrheovnwG 19WT94+ZY9gcNsrU5lHf3q58IhGdHqrUtJlKZaF+9/9tBCE+oLls6XqNggJ3hxZNYe6I YM6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=G4ahw32h/+veguOBGYF/w74Hvv+hdV67SEu6ZUz3ns0=; b=IVByivW7V4D88sDCMEOJhYIDFz2rC1I8JlaEKkca8jkABDsDUFHxUbYsgSC2bbfDoz T6jZhkTQd84tZDeuW4VUHFJFVb6SqqqECCe34odyPqLEuRR8IjqkQNxxzF0/PeEYm115 r3WH0FpaKIH2+D7lkZr8J4oj/OTTj2AAtOs7MMw0bzUjqbPH6S5vYdtkCVOp/U4Wl0rS qtW4zRDCoAlTTx53onhqng97mQ9Ol8nt/lTRVi7sYuHVA6n3PTefBlA+LwCcKp2GUPkX tM6s4XissfpzJzzOKROAuXykQIw8eZFvHH4fqSD2m4QMLFdkz5o4XzUs6HasWDC5MZgd ZviQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT67Vqz5mUD/FW7nXmpDpipcfCnEAc6l8/Ah976V01O4YPJlpaT6nyh9LCylvh/3tE5UlUNfxBCxhBujwYe
X-Received: by 10.13.202.16 with SMTP id m16mr16513936ywd.160.1456237854223; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.19.65 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56CC691D.7000904@si6networks.com>
References: <20160201142413.30288.23248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr11tEDEPXkUWj4g_-wL=AgYRu7LYrOkgobEMtwOW4CpEA@mail.gmail.com> <003001d1687a$926ab2e0$b74018a0$@huitema.net> <56C3161F.3070301@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr15EYQdS3XR4zenqmpBn2K2Zue2a+mMz1m+Vw54ou7zZQ@mail.gmail.com> <56CB891E.6060902@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3MdjMrMMW+Mv2n_Ls+94Ry23e8Y_LCXhH1t4nF9Rjm4w@mail.gmail.com> <56CBA305.1050400@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3fA4+vdfUbxxxVvbpy8JRHC8TuKqXHHv6F9HBj2rL=fA@mail.gmail.com> <019301d16e1d$979ed1d0$c6dc7570$@huitema.net> <56CC3D31.6000403@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0Q6ge2qOFJ1o90mwdLr3mYEQF6uiy6=xUEgpLr-0cC_g@mail.gmail.com> <56CC5FDB.5020108@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2cBvF6eWUiKUMVi4QA81wYbu8zZUx9NdqXUwE_TdtCdA@mail.gmail.com> <56CC691D.7000904@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:30:34 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1Cf7d4a7_7iG1cn9iXGcBE5vYkw-EWoUfVfSP5UZce+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f00fa02e201052c70cc89"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/-5ZH-TprIsBmU5-9b2UOZHa-28I>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile@ietf.org, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:30:58 -0000

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:

> > The draft doesn't say that the host shouldn't accept information
> > provided by DHCPv6. It says that the host shouldn't request such
> > information if it has all it needs from something else.
>
> Say you only receive a ULA/64 in the RA. Is that "all you needed"?

(particularly if there was a GUA available via DHCPv6)
>

I don't see what question that has to do with whether this document updates
RFC 4861 or not. Happy to discuss that question in another thread, but not
here. (The "all you needed" words aren't even in the draft - they are mine).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email