[dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Tue, 28 August 2012 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCE221F859C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JeYbYHOQ+1NV for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog103.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog103.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F7C21F8598 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob103.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDz0RbUeoWrauBp5BHezd1LBiuaJcoAj@postini.com; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:33 PDT
Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11so13943231iae.23 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=+NvuAyI2U0agCc0vdVxuzm043EFpxXo2OoZL/6KyZds=; b=V/y3HYWBh9YUwqC5dn4j2AlzWs6WxXhEmjUSMiUDqrtDAzLd6Y/zXF1gJ3ZZpLkQpD i1yZE2iQ1WXkm62ejMr9077mOOIBF1N/R+kS0CAfdFmZFIR2D6cBkUKLHyOd8DGA3P7H h5dMKFzWO5Id28wQ2GVg3V8pUiMizVHm5p/1O1m7DwhZLvX1j7p6sJqKolmwZsJ8W5A+ GYiwCrZydNf8gveaIooODC/R1z/MhAG8QYzGqlDWXZpPGHi2vX/hQnpsAO/MjfZkcTUR DYGLHCBqdzbDkKsrS70v+TYEjcoIquVQJzPM4qxHfp61KdE11EI8u4FswSVehIY+HeVF yx7w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.117.129 with SMTP id fm1mr7160277icc.1.1346171972766; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.63.169 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:39:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL10_Bqa4ftiVhyyf0ezwKR7mzAEOLNi_K3EJFPFUzPnz7QGPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3mfifm+63zXuKPDu9jzEztCYQoWWZr1rtS22pxDG6+pPxl2kakY6WXJd6me6wbuL0kqqS
Subject: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:39:38 -0000

Dear all:

I have submitted a new I-D updating RFC 3074 to apply to DHCPv6.

The text is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kostur-dhc-loadbv6-00.txt

Comments and suggestions welcome.   I am looking to have the WG take
this on as a work item.

--
Andre Kostur