Re: [dhcwg] Call for Agenda Items for IETF-88 (Vancouver)

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 07 October 2013 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2446611E8102 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0LSt-qVlIbC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-x236.google.com (mail-ee0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7036E21F9F6F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e53so3474598eek.27 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4yaINN0prISoN75HPICMqYLjnpLbstuHf3UL+jwvjpA=; b=pu1TMiE8KH7Xa8645mD/joheup39XNe/S4MnGZ6bGi8b+OCpPYKhjw6iRq7Z3Nclbb TkPqIMSGNfPqBWNsJEMrAqwGAm26wetb/LbHAXPbNFS9D/d10TQV8B7wvlxPmjCyCUFM iQPlvxeimhOTdHEhtRjRCSP/lO8WbJgAPN81qvVphDtvQWzM5jW6ern8TXp30PZXpUqW 8JPgrcxNEgnOeURbuz4+CRylI8/6Bl/vhB57T87bs6Sc36CRuBAClepZ0IqVu6N76cid Q1P079ju8U7f0zQC1weBLQqnAAjjJUSePmeNVEW3R3V8HWABVoeP0VnpkjGIemRJcNpt RW0Q==
X-Received: by 10.15.98.194 with SMTP id bj42mr51151598eeb.12.1381167291532; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm65709966eev.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5252F0B3.5000101@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:34:43 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ACF6595@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ACF6595@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20131007193443943
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Agenda Items for IETF-88 (Vancouver)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:34:53 -0000

On 06.10.2013 21:24, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> We are starting the call for agenda items. The co-chairs will finalize
> the agenda about two weeks before the meeting and will give priority to
> items as follows (in this order):



> If you would like time, please indicate:
> -          Draft name or topic
> -          Who will present
> -          How much time is needed
> 
> -          Why is time needed (tell us why you can’t get what you need
> by posting on the mailing list) and what will be covered

I'd like to request a 20 minutes slot for RFC3315bis work. There's no
draft yet. I will be the presenter. This time is needed, because 3315bis
is in the charter and advancement of the DHCPv6 protocol is one of
primary goals of this WG.

This will be more or less a follow-up discussion to the discussion that
will happen soon on the mailing list (will send out an initial proposal
in couple days). I'd like to discuss the following issues:

- clarify the goal of the 3315bis work
- scope of work:
   - coming up with a list of RFCs and drafts that we want to merge
   - coming up with a proposed list of changes + justifications why they
     are necessary
- call for volunteers
- work organisation (a "design" or "editors" team? where to store
  intermediate draft revisions?)

Tomek