[dhcwg] Re: draft-bakke-dhc-snmp-trap-00.txt

David-

Thanks for the advice.  I just had a chance to go over 2571, 73, and 74, and
I think I can take a better shot at this (at least the notification part).  I'll
post to both dhcwg and the snmpv3 lists.

As far as the scope for this, I was initially just setting out to do
enough for notifications.  Do you think that there is interest in
configuring other agent parameters as well?

-
Mark

> "Harrington, David" wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> RFC1448 is a remnant of the obsolete SNMPv2 specs. Nobody supports the old RFC144x specifications.
> You should be using SNMPv3 specifications. The most current RFCs are 2570-2580, and approved
> updates are in the editor's RFC queue.
> 
> RFC2573 defines a number of mibs that can be configured to identify notification targets. If you
> examine those mibs, you will find that there is more information needed than just an address.
> Therefore, your proposed message would need to contain more to centrally configure SNMP targets
> properly.
> 
> dbh
> 
> David Harrington
> co-chair SNMPv2 WG
> Network Management Architect
> Office of the CTO
> Enterasys Networks
> 

-- 
Mark A. Bakke
Cisco Systems
mbakke@cisco.com
763.398.1054
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg