IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-00.txt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AFA11E84DE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fuNOCUB9njJ2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og126.obsmtp.com (exprod7og126.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A34C11E840C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUmakh+aYWnhmmaI3pRP+DWmEjkxyk6KH@postini.com; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:15:24 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83F81B8152 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A775F190052; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:15:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:14:58 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOztr+qeyvH50ZYkS21xtwsh9mdZoBAmMAgAA4lACAAB8gAIAAAT6A
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:14:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D1E66764-33AD-4711-8D9F-127528DE6B67@nominum.com>
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040B73B14D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040B73B14D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <482C053ED24FFB46B90F51F55FBB338C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:15:34 -0000

On Oct 22, 2013, at 12:10 PM, "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> wrote:
> [RP] But this draft gives as example in section 5 a DHCP server giving the
> address of a SIP server as a DHCP option.

Ah, that is the key detail I was missing.   I haven't read the full draft in quite some time; I republished it as a working group draft with comments addressed, but didn't do a full review.   And my thinking about SIP servers and DHCP has been informed by recent discussions.

You are right—we need to find a better example to use.   I'm sorry for misunderstanding—I didn't realize that this is what you were saying.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email