[dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (2/3) - Raise objections by 12/1/2017
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 23 November 2016 19:44 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705B2129E4A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BuU_zqVQtvM8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E20129E45 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:44:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7715; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479930273; x=1481139873; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=3uDrE6eKW5hrOsnbP51Gbl6ioCkMaXUiKyJ769hOcAE=; b=Bc3qJnY6ZdTIn1wiUBegv4k0dS8YVN28wMxFM0nWt1PlSxsLpj8P06ne C6iQ8S3r5ef5nL1QQ9HsTXD21U/D0X0XfvW0ztf6Y2xP3PI++4oQp4ZOw rKOmv8xQ/fUoFiBPsqNjSlDOczjYPOL4HsiYCHZ3ozOUQba130JSNw68d s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuAQC28DVY/5xdJa1eGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBgnNFAQEBAQEfWIECB405pm6FH4IHKogWPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiHQuEbQItXgGBACYBBBuIZQ6eHJIli1UBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBARsFjzQRAYV9BZpPAZB3kDmRdQEeN142HoNlgUVyAYYWgSGBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,539,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="177198008"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Nov 2016 19:44:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uANJiWsG005004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:33 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:44:32 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:44:32 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (2/3) - Raise objections by 12/1/2017
Thread-Index: AdJFwOneLbmOWoEDSua9Fbl0eAzttw==
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:32 +0000
Message-ID: <b51ccf6aa01d4643bdece3a65683c7c9@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_b51ccf6aa01d4643bdece3a65683c7c9XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/-cDLqTAebuk0VDHx0oCg-mb1AdI>
Subject: [dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (2/3) - Raise objections by 12/1/2017
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:35 -0000
Hi: At IETF-97 (Seoul) I presented several issues that had been raised by reviewers during the WGLC of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05. The second was regarding multiple state machines. Here are the Etherpad notes taken by Tim Chown and others: - Multiple state machines (81) Proposal to allow multiple independent state machines on one interface. Hence the text is a SHOULD. Bernie: Not sure we want to reword or remove. Ted: If you have servers doing PD and NA, this will mean more work. But not likely. Bernie: Agree. Action: will confirm on list So, this email is to confirm that we will keep the text "as is" in section 17.1.10.1 of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05. We will assume that everyone supports this approach UNLESS someone raises an objection. You have until 12/1/2017 to raise an objection. See slide #5 at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-dhc-dhcpv6bis-open-issues-discussion-01.pdf. - Bernie (for the bis team)
- [dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc… Bernie Volz (volz)