IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18A521F84AE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.103, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1u3blCwBrnk for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFB421F84A5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUFsDkpos9JAUPkJdoT4sPihDvCanQ+G2@postini.com; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:50 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C9A1B8338 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB0819005C; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:52:49 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01
Thread-Index: AQHNlrARAq1IuhHT2UasbuE4rMIyj5eTcnSA//+tFsU=
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:52:49 +0000
Message-ID: <B8AEC01A-BE66-4626-B0A1-1F239C47A4DC@nominum.com>
References: <EBDD0AE4-93C6-44F1-9BE0-7B7BE5EC2173@nominum.com>, <3F72DAD4-A8BE-48F5-A640-73915189554F@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <3F72DAD4-A8BE-48F5-A640-73915189554F@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:52:52 -0000

On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:49 AM, "Ole Trøan" <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that the work should be done in DHC though. dnsext? 

Didn't they disband again?  Also, why would they work on a DHCP protocol extension?

I fully agree that the draft should be reviewed by a DNS working group–I would have suggested DNSOP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email