Return-Path: <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 8059621F854D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.384
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.215,
 BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EmSEZYuU7AyY for
 <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by
 ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3088E21F852C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>;
 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com)
 ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP
 id AIM46150; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) by
 dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:26:52 -0700
Received: from SZXEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.138) by
 dfweml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:26:51 -0700
Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.103]) by
 szxeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003;
 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:26:48 +0800
From: Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
To: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-01
Thread-Index: Ac1uenz8FGMSnBsdRxyqCofl+okxGwAVGMKg
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:26:48 +0000
Message-ID: <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EA3C4505B7@SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE519702F11C@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
In-Reply-To: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE519702F11C@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.66.83.152]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, 'Ted Lemon' <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>,
 <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>,
 <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:29:55 -0000

Roberta - you should add DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name (145) defined in RFC 6519 in t=
he list of the attributes that can be carried in the OPTION_RADIUS.

I am fine with to add DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name (144) to join the list, which hel=
ps DHCPv6 server to get the stateless parameter of AFTR FQDN in OPTION_AFTR=
_NAME (64) for CE to support DS-Lite.=20

Roberta - In addition, in my opinion, you should write some text to say tha=
t these are the RADIUS attributes currently defined in IETF, but in future =
new attributes may be defined and there may be the need to add such new att=
ributes in this list.

The draft (OPTION_RADIUS) has some text in section 4. <quote>Note: The abov=
e table might have more attributes in the future.</quote> I guess it might =
meet your concern mentioned above. I can also expect more attribute related=
 to IPv6 transition tech. including MAP, and etc., which are under definiti=
on, might join the list in the future.


Best Regards,
Leaf


-----Original Message-----
From: Maglione Roberta [mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it]=20
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:39 AM
To: dhc WG; Leaf yeh; 'Ted Lemon'
Subject: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-01

Hello,
 I read the draft and I have a comment:
you should add DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name (145) defined in RFC 6519 in the list of=
 the attributes that can be carried in the OPTION_RADIUS.

In addition, in my opinion, you should write some text to say that these ar=
e the RADIUS attributes currently defined in IETF, but in future new attrib=
utes may be defined and there may be the need to add such new attributes in=
 this list.

Thanks
Regards
Roberta

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle per=
sone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dall=
a conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abb=
iate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di dar=
ne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione=
, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged =
information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, pri=
nting or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended r=
ecipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sen=
der by return e-mail, Thanks.

