Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!

"Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva)" <draghuva@cisco.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <draghuva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1588721F996F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YnlqaRv6gbQi for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4C021F99FA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12002; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375084695; x=1376294295; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=KyVwBNxegNRJV6Ejb2PUXA4o19UkLYd7ZdskF/ELfjA=; b=Mtfk3OlrhlVUdEdNyIZkGczRajdixyVTmX9x3IRYXjC1rjJxPfuf9qCF 24fxiqs496NGNdZlJm20OsjiAKMYLgaBo00Xur8SxQ0OOaJABNUmZMAQD KKwcOQ5gsOnaVPU+tCuEVFM1N1I+C9vsi1lbgw2FbjE6T9DS0/g38m90N w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlkFAGgf9lGtJXG//2dsb2JhbABRCoJCRDVQtRyIOoEUFnSCJAEBAQQBAQEqQR0BCBEDAQILHS4LFAkJAQQTCIgIDJdToAWORIEIIA0KgxlvA5kIkCOBW4E5gio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,767,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="240683239"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2013 07:58:14 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6T7wEjE002027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:58:14 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.27]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 02:58:14 -0500
From: "Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva)" <draghuva@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
Thread-Index: Ac6MMUqkqXzV1NEaRPGFhCskW/1XcA==
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:58:13 +0000
Message-ID: <0A2ED610A80E7B4DBCC8E63B8E7EE43027038F0F@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.142.42.159]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0A2ED610A80E7B4DBCC8E63B8E7EE43027038F0Fxmbrcdx02ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 01:16:10 -0700
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:58:20 -0000

Hi,

                I have read this draft and have couple of comments for spelling mistakes to be fixed.
                Below mentioned are the points. With these changes, I think this draft should move forward.

1. Need to change "idenpendent" to "independent" in second paragraph in section 6.3.
2. Change "lease" to "least" in "BNDACK MUST contain at lease minimum set of information required to unabiguously identify BNDUDP." in section 8.10.

Thanks & Regards,
Dushyant.


From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com<mailto:volz@cisco.com>>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
Date: July 19, 2013 9:59:20 AM EDT
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>>

Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design) believe it is ready for working group last call. Please review this draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published. Your input is important!

This document is the 2nd series of documents related to DHCPv6 failover - the first is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-requirements which is currently being reviewed by the IESG for publication approval.

At the time of this writing, there is no IPR reported against this draft.

As Tomek is a co-author, I will primarily evaluate consensus after 2013-08-09 (August 9th). This is a 3 week last call because of the Berlin IETF meeting and also because of summer-time vacations (at least for those of us in the northern hemisphere).

Thanks,

-          Bernie
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg