Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Fri, 21 September 2012 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC6A21F8839 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQx23RgGoph2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs-w.tc.umn.edu (vs-w.tc.umn.edu [134.84.135.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8385521F8838 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by vs-w.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:52:06 -0500 (CDT)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172] #+LO+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by iec9 with SMTP id 9so6245402iec.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=1nhpPGwwATThM+EKHhpTQTAnX8az4H3frWen+nJvBO8=; b=YsXSfVeI3lMU8pWfPOFJ5TdSL1ojNzzRC3s3Zc0dJAbppuP7nxY8IjVQZrFgxDGfV4 GtqkR00ymxY9wS90pfvROEmTGjMKgmfNy6Zoytvp/n+lzaJsUrazI5PWwi54p26Gi+pf hx/5UfnJ0n1OdM8Hl4tz3V6kwuUbUZDlSdHuUMbbbF0Q3ygcKyjl1piOyTQV4gPMSlaG +R2Sxey4n74xGI+j2OPMn4axMnTRgnNm2BAetHMty6Xx7+0cji/eIsdYUYyP6hiZVcCb ar+pJfXpwzi/aOAGjF1O/s4Nd98AbR7XNnSRO2NitbeqK7YytRunRoDy40zzIZTYedYV ahMA==
Received: by 10.50.186.169 with SMTP id fl9mr1752616igc.9.1348235501666; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oit200959392.local (c-24-118-200-23.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [24.118.200.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nh1sm17268977igc.11.2012.09.21.06.51.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <505C70EC.4030501@umn.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:51:40 -0500
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <BF22E1BC-0E6B-4245-95C4-95E8B0F210B0@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF22E1BC-0E6B-4245-95C4-95E8B0F210B0@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7RN/tkqrb+vDkw6x6ke8KnV53xIx9yX0pLBXwXkYPyCbThXGDZzfmlhP9Ff9agAAoD3ks
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:54:03 -0000

On 9/21/12 07:08 CDT, Ted Lemon wrote:
> The authors have sub,tired a new version of this document to address concerns raised in the previous WGLC. If you participated in the previous WGLC or want to participate now, please review the (short) draft and send comments to the mailing list if you have any.  Also please indicate whether you support advancing the draft at this time or not.

I support this draft as-is and hope it is expeditiously moved forward 
both within the IETF and for implementation by vendors of both DHCPv6 
Relay Agents and Servers.

This issue is holding back broader deployment of IPv6, especially in 
enterprise environments, where MAC address tracking is a very common 
part of network security and management practice. This will align DHCPv6 
with such practices and hopefully remove one more road block in the way 
of deployment of IPv6 in many environments.

Thanks
-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota	
2218 University Ave SE	    Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================