IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 12 December 2013 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4A21ADF8B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:26:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4cDOMYa7cj9N for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545191ADED5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:26:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1554; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386883578; x=1388093178; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zl6Him6vu+OwWKmWblNi2yneX+veJ4UouX7MrTY6Raw=; b=cKdOFCxbDOJ+3jshOmgtQx+4mkcT0KkTc+Sr/ilIlhNEM04u9GHMUB2j PiAUv4ppvo+fITqLh/bFFHwndYuwf21cy1OG7J0Wcp8eVl8ZK9ZjsH+Qb pYrsylUgQH3xrjsAU/xFSkZV4hDaSnn0f8tNBx1N2UaOwItXh9peL3enC Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgQFALwoqlKtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABZgwo4VbhYgR0WdIIlAQEBBAEBATc0CwwEAgEIDgMEAQEBChQJBycLFAkIAgQOBQiHfA3DJBMEjmMxBwaDHIETBKopgWuBPoIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,473,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="6398647"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBCLQIvo019253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:26:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.232]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:26:17 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
Thread-Index: AQHO90lArmKZq0TABkWmduI/5klrZppQxvXAgAB8VAD//88B8A==
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:26:16 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADE290C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADA99A8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADD590C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CE4E8958-57AA-4D87-AA80-F2B12FF1A698@gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADDF49A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <F0A0E7AD-387E-4F9C-8200-4297E79BA566@gmail.com> <0676A81F-E5B1-423C-8233-A5B143908A3A@nominum.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADE2293@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAFGoqUNZMXjNEx8=DhWPuqdmemWNfd6Exr4CtS3_p34sUpnVVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFGoqUNZMXjNEx8=DhWPuqdmemWNfd6Exr4CtS3_p34sUpnVVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.65.131]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, "draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:26:25 -0000

I already indicated (twice) that I was likely the source of the current names (though I believe I suggested BOOTP, not BOOT, because that was the protocol). Not all my ideas are good and sometimes what looks good at first turns out to be poor when seen in more context or given more thought.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marcin Siodelski
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:19 PM
To: Bernie Volz (volz)
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; Ted Lemon; draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-03 - Respond by Dec 9, 2013

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> I wonder whether DHCPV4REQUEST and DHCPV4REPLY (perhaps with a hyphen) may actually be better choices for the V6 messages. While the underlying protocol is BOOTP, that name is somewhat misleading and most everything now uses DHCP[v4] -- yes, I know that I was likely the source of those original message names.
>
I think you were the source of the names, Bernie. And I also think I was the one who changed the original names to those that you suggested
:)
On reflection, I think we should revert it to something that has
DHCPV4 in it - it is less confusing and it is much easier to read than BOOTREQUESTV6. I like DHCPV4-REQUEST/DHCPV4-REPLY.

Marcin
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email