Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-6man-default-iids Section 4 & 6.9 (DHCPv6)

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sat, 06 August 2016 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9AA12B061; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.026
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.626, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8Lis0DoXZsg; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475E112D51A; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 35so209444673uap.1; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T3VLmIbfe99V/x0Tsbok8s0ZOp0Edmg6Q+HOSArD+Ww=; b=bb91vNNJYtvCVgVlbd7ltO2TSuIWQXVgOZb+cpqrZqYi+qb8lP8ke4cMj+zTpHc9dN DT15xPJYkeIHLHLCYQK3d5owXVrWaU8ZVCvY2LqHgUOp9dwioevGfej3/eieT8XPRdxn XnkWyMe5un52KlFS/dAvYpBh1cK1lz6Alkdgg9OokjAeNB30siDaL0KRCKfRW8SCWu35 MGBLnUJsTxTQKsUpmE5D92qtW7uZiidketU2PcD9mHFY6Hyhpiw8kpQIhqCJk7ZPuT2b ASg2ZRYy89Ga53h6/5T22zArJWPjhrbBtt47bl5TqpimFPaNVPcZo2AKr9C4ES8aZ/FV 8Ktw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T3VLmIbfe99V/x0Tsbok8s0ZOp0Edmg6Q+HOSArD+Ww=; b=AxpgyD7aXbnctQdi5IY+fzxRkoVcmhNgGPwXhzujKJgbXrc7GDCPGJTWj+gOoQAk5v wC+jUmlr5S3P+TBPUoXaGdfO949Lg4mnMFA7H6ieUr6m+sOy46reBkgPgtgcPEHroHuT /aFNjP1aOBTKUByQdiZXErycgU3eujV8w3+Bew+Ma51c9nWqAz8Jm3t3aGPtyyx1XODN TkpKfM8KxCmEL1+G6HvO0YR+fGfqtSV0bA8L8x4Ujz6+luA8yh4V2XvIUFv2w0Bfsekm vZiBIOTpHxXul7AEs2oViZ4S16RnSith+ZylfSqihGHvS48WGl14hvmoaRFcTE/BxJcE GS1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutt6joAb04hy/rGgMEsHLQPQR3WOn2mUbVKUek8r+MmX3A8APrPw5Fm3G7QovuLrS+fberbhxYohP2v0g==
X-Received: by 10.176.0.211 with SMTP id 77mr2180940uaj.75.1470446224337; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.54.233 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.159.54.233 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9fb468f9-7f8f-0c0f-ad3e-6d6ff31f3521@si6networks.com>
References: <D3B60069.31262%volz@cisco.com> <43CE5CAD-2D98-4A75-BF33-E5B415B1013C@employees.org> <D3B605F6.31290%volz@cisco.com> <4FA70E3F-1AED-4662-AEA9-1BCA107F87AD@cooperw.in> <9fb468f9-7f8f-0c0f-ad3e-6d6ff31f3521@si6networks.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 11:17:03 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2z55B5WHR=Oaa=WF1tM4i4LFmFxWC5pe1opqQ46ZOWdtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d101cdcf14b05395cf0e7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/13eE9utquyn0o5YarFHF-AH4AB4>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-default-iids@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "dhcpv6bis@ietf.org" <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-6man-default-iids Section 4 & 6.9 (DHCPv6)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:17:07 -0000

On 5 Aug 2016 22:42, "Fernando Gont" <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2016 10:23 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> On Jul 21, 2016, at 1:58 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ole:
> >>
> >> (I fixed 6man mailing list address.)
> >>
> >> That is probably the best solution and I would support that.
> >>
> >> We can still discuss changing some of the text in 3315bis, but that can
> >> then be done without 6man involvement. (We do still have the older
text in
> >> what is now Section 12.1 of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05, so should
really
> >> clean that up.)
> >
> > I am fine with this solution and it seems cleaner.
>
> Background: At some point folks argued that this document should cover
> SLAAC, DHCPv6, and manual configuration. And hence this text was added.
>
> I don't mind removing the DHCPv6 text. However, if we do, we should
> probably also remove the text about manual configuration. Otherwise it
> is not clear why some forms of configuration are covered, but others are
> not.
>

I argued for that because I think privacy is a primary property of an
address, not the method used to configure it. However, since the different
methods of configuring the address can effect the resulting address's
privacy properties, I think it is necessary to discuss how to achieve
privacy for the three different configuration methods we have in the one
place.

Regards,
Mark.

> Thanks,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------