RE: [dhcwg] Revised charter
"S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> Sat, 10 April 2004 00:13 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02126 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:13:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC67S-0003XN-0m for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:13:12 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3A0D9Vs013593 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:13:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC67R-0003XA-Sp for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:13:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02113 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:13:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC67P-0006BQ-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:13:07 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BC66C-00064e-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:11:53 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC65O-0005xz-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:11:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC65N-0003M0-7m; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:11:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BC65I-0003Li-Rb for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:10:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02043 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:10:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC65E-0005xS-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:10:52 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BC64F-0005r6-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:09:52 -0400
Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BC63P-0005e3-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:08:59 -0400
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout1.samsung.com by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HVX00D08HQ1NX@mailout1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:08:25 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp2 (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HVX00K35HPX3N@mailout1.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:08:21 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.202.103]) by mmp2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HVX0061NHPWDN@mmp2.samsung.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:08:21 +0900 (KST)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:08:42 +0900
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Revised charter
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040409082236.02ac7a50@flask.cisco.com>
To: 'Ralph Droms' <rdroms@cisco.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Message-id: <00b001c41e8f$fc085e60$67cadba8@LocalHost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Can you give us more details? What problems would we > consider as part of mobility support in DHCP? Well, I think it's not problem but restriction in DHCP. I guess current DHCP architecture is not concretely matched to the mobility because of long round-trips to get IP address and related information. Above all DHCP is a natural choice in the Wireless Lan (802.11) in conjunction with Access Point (AP), thus I think it's worth discussing this with dhc folks. It's [Introduction] [Background] [Design Goals] sections of preparing draft for your information and it will be available soon. Hope this helps. 1. Introduction The world has become increasingly mobile. As a result, traditional ways of networking the world have proven inadequate to meet the challenges posed by our new collective lifestyle. Wireless technology has been successful because it enables people to connect with each other regardless of location and the most successful wireless networking technology this far has been 802.11 WLAN [802.11][WLAN]. Regarding the wireless technology, DHCP [RFC 2131] is widely used for obtaining the network configuration on the mobile node such as its unique IP address and others in the local networks. DHCP is useful with access point which generally includes a DHCP server because it minimizes mobile node configuration. The DHCP server (access point) can be allocated a pool of addresses. The administrator specifies both the DHCP based address and the size of the pool. The DHCP server (access point) can also be configured to hand out a default gateway and DNS server information. The main objective of this draft is to propose a new architecture of DHCP to support the mobility on the DHCP client as mobile node. Also fast network attachment mechanism should be considered in conjunction with the mobile IP [RFC 3220] [MIP6] which allows a mobile node to move from one link to another without changing the mobile node's "home address". Packets may be routed to the mobile node using this address regardless of the mobile node's current point of attachment to the Internet. The mobile node may also continue to communicate with other nodes (stationary or mobile) after moving to a new link. The movement of a mobile node away from its home link is thus transparent to transport and higher-layer protocols and applications. The aim of this draft is neither network information such as DNS nor fast handover mechanism [FH802.11]. 3. Background The aim of this draft is to discuss mobility issue in the DHCP environment and it is especially appropriate for processes and devices which already interpret DHCP messages. In particular, a new proposed architecture allow DHCP server to send available IP addresses to DHCP client quickly to attach a new network when in motion. Placing DHCP server on the access point is a natural choice in the 802.11 wireless environment. The Unsolicited message is an extension to the DHCP protocol. The main purpose of this draft is to provide a starting point of mobility issue in the DHC Working Group. 4. Design Goals The goal of this draft is to provide a lightweight mechanism for supporting mobility in the DHCP environment. It is designed to optimize current DHCP mechanism to cut down number of round-trips between DHCP client and DHCP server. Here are some requirements why this design is required. [1] Wireless technologies especially 802.11 are widely spread in the DHCP environment, thus fast network attachment is importantly required on the DHCP client when in motion. [2] Current 4-messages exchange is not matched for the mobility. [3] Effectively this design aims outperforming rapid commit technique by substituting the explicit DHCP operation with the implicit link-layer association event. [4] DHCP server functionality is common on the access point. [5] For supporting mobility on the current DHCP protocol, minimal additional configuration/requirement is required. - Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) - Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Revised charter Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Revised charter S. Daniel Park
- RE: [dhcwg] Revised charter Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Revised charter Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Revised charter Bernie Volz
- RE: [dhcwg] Revised charter S. Daniel Park