IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28

Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Fri, 28 February 2014 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79491A0102 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFSJJeuIER_R for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942251A0370 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p10so507880pdj.12 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8pH3a2wFm9y3ZtwoRMO/jeXM3VyucwnT+P8fGw8PJw4=; b=lOkPECKeT61J/FcAt2Nl+GoV/U13WESASuh6M8qeo8AMGv3ibV5qwLFqtNEj3MprWI taBsACKni+geagklpRkg8AXeFBKLSbtHIIYDA75TUjuYBw4jhxYObqt3WoWMaiyvT2zf PSWT8mimu493MbtPs19mLlTLZmTyx8+oSEX//xH9YLEOm1yha5wfCeFvgS25B6/yfWdh v/rJLfI0qmCgoggz899+3Mm9AXY8mUTin+F1bFpbBTbldHTGOOfcsYrh+O6wBjMQAl2k l+g/YRjvZ5IINC5Zwl+CwPJXhRs2MywCGhG7zXJNrmJf/BpYSkbGptEpLVxJWFbmPv8i Ayrg==
X-Received: by 10.66.142.233 with SMTP id rz9mr2282031pab.71.1393579574934; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2402:f000:ffff:64:9284:dff:fef3:d346? ([2402:f000:ffff:64:9284:dff:fef3:d346]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id op3sm4031198pbc.40.2014.02.28.01.26.12 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52FA8A40.8020703@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:26:07 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D741CAFD-D462-438A-82C0-F83D413C3738@gmail.com>
References: <52FA8A40.8020703@gmail.com>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2EluxqyaAry73pOiII1EawgTUvI
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:26:19 -0000

I have read this document, and I support this document to move forward.

A small suggestion:
Would it be helpful if there is a reference to related section of RFC6926 when the query-start-time option is first mentioned? Because I'm not quite familiar with RFC6929, it confuses me a little on what the query-start-time option is used for. 
BTW, I'm OK with the current shape if the option should be a well-known option. 

Thanks!

Best Regards,
Qi 


On 2014-2-12, at 上午4:38, Tomek Mrugalski wrote:

> We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
> There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but
> we never saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors
> confidence in those proposals are high due to existing implementations,
> they have requested WGLC.
> 
> After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead
> with the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
> Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A
> simple "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the
> trick here.
> 
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00. Please send
> your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very
> similar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
> If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft
> (v4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.
> 
> Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do
> the shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd
> for one of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior
> IETF experience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight
> into the WGLC process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such
> an experience can be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.
> 
> Bernie & Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email