Re: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly be IPv4-specific?
Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Fri, 09 April 2004 01:20 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA20188 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:20:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBkgV-0003k8-OD for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:19:55 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i391JtOa014384 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:19:55 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBkgV-0003jv-Ka for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:19:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA20137 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:19:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBkgS-000161-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:19:53 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBkN4-0007I0-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:59:51 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBk8Y-0004JV-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:44:50 -0400
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BBjs0-000561-Vq for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:27:46 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBjrW-00043h-ST; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:27:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBjF5-0007oM-6C for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:47:31 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA10833 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:47:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBjF2-0006UF-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:47:28 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBiIr-0007OX-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:47:21 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBgPn-0001Yr-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:46:23 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2004 12:53:55 +0000
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i38KjoKj018294; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 13:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kkinnear-w2k03.cisco.com ([161.44.65.230]) by flask.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AHL95419; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:45:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040408164453.0282ebd8@goblet.cisco.com>
X-Sender: kkinnear@goblet.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:45:47 -0400
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly be IPv4-specific?
Cc: kkinnear@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040406202408.02cc4ed8@flask.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
At 08:24 PM 4/6/2004, Ralph Droms wrote:
>Bert Wijnen:
>
>Discuss:
>- It seems to be implicitly IPv4 specific without explaining/justifying why
> and uses "IP address" to mean IPv4 addresses only. Do we not want them
> to either be IPv4/v6 agnostic or to be specific in stating that they
> are IPv4 only if such is the case and justified?
This is really just an oversight -- leasequery is IPv4 specific.
We'll fix the draft to make this clear.
Cheers -- Kim
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly be … Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly… Kim Kinnear