Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6

Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEBD21F8595 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.86
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.86 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9hKSiYl8x66 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog108.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog108.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EA58721F84D8 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob108.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUD5KCqOs0g8scvmXt+ow1VQ7ROTLnd5e@postini.com; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:47 PDT
Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so1703003iab.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+8gNNKO4hraXg+SkcH0fQyovO2rahwdchvxDdrTnBc4=; b=lxv1IWy8Cr85+WAJSgaNNsjxi7jUAy3v1d/XBToZmrdJhlO56+/065HrM1ATeXqNlI 4m+yXOVmVuLUt3rN/AtfMizY+nQwJOx4DxpJVWN/7o1PhKlNTv/QLjxNJiujNFgxeZOD zicV2pRUfQ1DMv6R3/MWBzyrZ22abr3xcVw/ozAM3VMCgw0AHi3pOkE+CZ9jcq3/mBqg dWvyxPf38+UiPDCYgEYYC49FuGmFmlePBUJqOHryJa37OVIXF6W8K/EJ9l9iWG6gz7+I 5qp3RP216FlSXCiUcWGHFP/aMzF1LT05TaGrolPIepyS4c1ntePaGWMKRv7MBasGeJOZ ZmUw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.156.133 with SMTP id we5mr17965938igb.62.1346259466070; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.63.169 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61118003F@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CAL10_Bqa4ftiVhyyf0ezwKR7mzAEOLNi_K3EJFPFUzPnz7QGPw@mail.gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4F3093@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <CAL10_Br=OcWZuar1fDOopevTy_W-3g9TsYqo61rOWm4tKkuYgg@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61118003F@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL10_BpXdx03WfV1PeMKg1zYc1dAFKe1CDNdrcNf45+_EVCBPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwU5E4kV1TkfM3RmtucS+l08KI0L0dtg7nRIM+9NAqzrOu3vW6JnkgR865C2XJfPppXe08
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Load Balancing for DHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:57:48 -0000

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:45 AM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:
> Broadband Forum requires use of DUID-EN for "Residential Gateways" that wish to meet its TR-124 specification.
> http://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-124_Issue-3.pdf

Say, this discussion is happening because of the 16-byte limitation.
Does anybody recall why the original load balancing had the 16 byte
restriction?

-- 
Andre Kostur