IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Please review draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp, particularly section 5.

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 19 March 2014 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37B71A0537 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hIyTxnf0ZjAm for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C431A04AF for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1632; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1395251272; x=1396460872; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OzY9b83XuDC8hdPNwGZN9iB1mTvCaylDfrfRijRHoOQ=; b=QQWk8Yq7yIQVsXG6QM3VcOYStjcpc458AVdDe9cdLAc2nzpbqLkYaXHz S4D+QJ3MdW3sB/a3YaXgPBFjvpPGM05+G4NXU2VwPHa7Qt79+qnar0T93 0IKJWeandCyMOe9Gk7c4WWI/S5dfIi9Eq51J4QFkCDvKK5XEt56uFVFdB 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAA/YKVOtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABagwY7V7sShzOBGxZ0giUBAQEEAQEBJEcLDAQCAQgRBAEBAQodBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIh3ENz3cXjjQxBwaDHoEUAQOJGpBfkH6DLYIr
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,687,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="311451838"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2014 17:47:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2JHlgcb004700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:47:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.92]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:47:41 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Please review draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp, particularly section 5.
Thread-Index: AQHPQ3gRGS6zp6HuO0u6GVs38nhhAZrorrSHgAAAE6A=
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:47:41 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF1CDBB@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36F51A2DB17@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <C7964664-C302-4ABE-9CAC-1AD5D9048699@cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF1C1CA@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <5329B584.1090404@viagenie.ca> <CBE2A263-A6B8-4B46-9454-6F63731DE0DC@nominum.com> <5329D758.6050404@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5329D758.6050404@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.70.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2c2NDpRLcOIqLn_TN-BhbvvV8dg
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Please review draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp, particularly section 5.
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:48:02 -0000

Does ISC support you configuring multiple instances of the same option as was the original document's plan? And, will it put all of these instances into the packet?

I know there are servers that DON'T support this because there was never a requirement for it.

So, I think this argument/data point is useless *if* this requirement for multiple "instances" exists. Likely if this was a string and used some special string syntax (comma separated addresses with some other delimiter between instances) then it could be supported. But IN *NO* WAY am I suggesting that.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon Perreault
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:44 PM
To: Ted Lemon
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Please review draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp, particularly section 5.

Le 2014-03-19 13:29, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>> But arrays of arrays seem to not be supported. :(
> 
> It's a simple matter of programming... :)
> 
> (Seriously, it wouldn't be very hard to get it working.)

Sure. As I said, just a data point. Everything else being equal, it would be nice if no programming was necessary.

Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email