[dhcwg] Re: Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability
Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@asu.edu> Thu, 22 August 2002 21:16 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11208 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7MLHHX19730 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:17:17 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MLHHo19727 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:17:17 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11199 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:15:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MLDco19630; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:13:38 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MIP7o09341 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:25:07 -0400
Received: from fed1mtao01.cox.net (fed1mtao01.cox.net [68.6.19.244]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA05509 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([68.2.221.180]) by fed1mtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20020822182418.GJEI1360.fed1mtao01.cox.net@localhost.localdomain>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:24:18 -0400
From: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@asu.edu>
To: cstueckjuergen@web.de
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <200208221143.g7MBhlX22375@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
References: <200208221143.g7MBhlX22375@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:25:05 -0700
Message-Id: <1030040705.7473.1.camel@timmy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > if (wrong net) { > > should nak; > > } else { > > if (!ok ip) { > > should nak; > > } > > } > > > > but then the "If the DHCP server has no record of this client" clause is > > thrown in. At what stage of the block does this go in? I would say this > > clause would go *before* 'if (wrong net)'. > > > > I'll cc this to the Dynamic Host Configuration working group. Hopefully > > they'll have some answers. > > > > I would replace (!ok ip) by (requested ip is ours but is no longer/has never been > assigned to the requesting client). Then the conditions (wrong net) and (requested ip > is ours but...) are mutually exclusive. > > So my parsing of the RFC would look loke that: > > if (wrong net) { > should nak; > } else if (requested ip is ours but...) { > should nak; > } else { > remain silent; > } define 'ours' a little better, do you mean if there is a static mapping for the address that we take care of? _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability Russ Dill
- [dhcwg] Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability Russ Dill
- [dhcwg] Re: Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability cstueckjuergen
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability Ted Lemon
- [dhcwg] Re: Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability Russ Dill
- [dhcwg] Re: Re: Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperability cstueckjuergen
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: Re: udhcpd Win98 interoperabi… Ted Lemon