Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition

"Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74BB129AD9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:48:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8cMAVuGZlyC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D455B129AC8 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:48:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id s186so8468798qkb.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 07:48:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=ubzAfe3cmqt1PFZkozImamCxsOGjmgMiCrK+uPhVqWE=; b=1tRwFe8NhTt+EDKVHZeqzpsIsqM/r2y7KkB+cagedBENUEAKCZ1NOAYWjWvwC0I0s+ 6E7Uddb+AYXvmxtIduOlBBr92ya8ijSbo069tr6CxqMt0uwpmAgHMkYacDvLf4dTOkF3 SLqS9HoJ24NSmUp9yEn+g7rpZRj2GuwVr7+QeQ3zrPSgcLQNKxJY9iWjDZnFoCdxcRQq nNL3h2pw+wxapmiZgaoOS+HrjNnKgSX+kNA9zPpXZIcydxedbdl3Ip2dSmd2JvGzkBjQ 0aT+Y/i4QL4051/+ht7qtDS/HHe+36h+8sS0dx5mAUJcIyNfmzG6fDwKt6GEUDnPZhqX fzng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=ubzAfe3cmqt1PFZkozImamCxsOGjmgMiCrK+uPhVqWE=; b=GKVfcCyw9CidAwOaI/ZlSnqZYO7nCA99qEtuuK04ANP0vi+EfCf+zWnZExZ8oidbzn 2j8tsWjGPY+rRMBvnhkHwMIyXxb/D7gzHMsQs2jYxVvqr7EfJ2j4ctIA7kCHVYg1Vh6H 7il9BGdKx6srK67hf/F0dZ27Kc78VPOnX8UuhPw9RGDkrVVlf8UUTDnpnEhOGA5wlN+o bRUZnkRPLCA10faRltxRwVha5r/ssuVxEktzcg2RsySG4yjLItrjM8PsvWzvgFlJJs46 jqxdaawGLz6sgNRGBhzX0awjsp+Qqc3Rfrhk8EMr64smOrATUomaQh27cv0NoacNh5xj 01ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k1NObdkr0iAAim4uQeb7EfgGEoZGN5TWPkND+mXKPrfjIjfptXESJxA7J7dd1QzA==
X-Received: by 10.55.4.19 with SMTP id 19mr3878822qke.320.1486655312850; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 07:48:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.125.1] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm9438899qte.1.2017.02.09.07.48.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 07:48:31 -0800 (PST)
From: "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com>
To: "Mudric, Dusan" <dmudric@avaya.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:48:17 -0500
Message-ID: <0540D77C-E307-4B96-A53B-81599408C8F7@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA189BD@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
References: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA186B9@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <531b6fa753a441c19f1d47958f20b659@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18717@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <240e4b5573614422a42abec328872c0b@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18746@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <fd3365190bd445b1ad00a7d8043530dd@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA188B2@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <6792EF5E-8C1F-4D3B-BC6D-8D2EA011BF31@cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1890A@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <36880D80-601D-42BF-92F1-3E1B3A59A8FD@cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1892A@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <15160861-4D37-4A5E-900A-8AD688218EEF@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1898F@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <C16D3614-AD9E-4AB3-915B-5288DB0EB239@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA189BD@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate Trial (1.9.6r5344)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2u8VabwvHDzDP0mIyDZUbdNWMis>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:48:35 -0000

On 9 Feb 2017, at 10:46, Mudric, Dusan (Dusan) wrote:
> The first problem statement is about the server misconfiguration. 
> Instead of client silently ignoring the offered address, or even 
> worse, assigning the misconfigured address, the server (and 
> administrator) should be informed about the misconfiguration.

How does this make things better?