[dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02.txt
Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com> Thu, 19 July 2012 08:22 UTC
Return-Path: <cuiyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F8D21F86D1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.263, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1KaFwKP5N5CJ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6B421F86CB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AID72122; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 04:23:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:21:04 -0700
Received: from SZXEML434-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.62) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:21:02 -0700
Received: from SZXEML508-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.245]) by szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.62]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:20:57 +0800
From: Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNYzXZoETU98+IrkGaZig9RZMuEJcwRUTA
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:20:57 +0000
Message-ID: <8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE2163684D50E@SZXEML508-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.48.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:22:14 -0000
Hi, All According to the comments in the last meeting @Paris, we updated the draft. Changes are mainly as follows: 1. remove the unused and specific sub-options 2. define a "general" security option that provisions configuration information to DHCP clients. Any comment will be appreciated. Thanks! BR, Yang ================== Yang Cui, Ph.D. Huawei Technologies cuiyang@huawei.com -----邮件原件----- 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2012年7月16日 17:31 收件人: Cuiyang 主题: New Version Notification for draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02.txt A new version of I-D, draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Yang Cui and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Revision: 02 Title: Security option extensions for DHCP Creation date: 2012-07-16 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 7 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bi-dhc-sec-option Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02 Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bi-dhc-sec-option-02 Abstract: This document defines a new option that can be used by DHCP servers to provision with DHCP clients specific security configuration information. It has been known that DHCP protocol typically works at the very beginning stage of the access to networks, thus lack of security protection. However, although it is difficult to set up some security mechanism for DHCP protocol solely, it is able to play a key role for DHCP server to provide configuration information to help building security mechanism within those pre-configured DHCP clients and devices. This new option defines a simple extension to current standard format and benefits to those who need to activate security mechanism in an early stage and interoperate within devices from multiple vendors. The IETF Secretariat