Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-05.txt
Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Sat, 15 February 2014 03:08 UTC
Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758A71A007F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qN4w7oRYtTh7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys010aog111.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog111.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 589F51A0057 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f176.google.com ([209.85.128.176]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob111.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUv7aGgqeLoJrNZCvoDvjBrmYA9YE/NJv@postini.com; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:11 PST
Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id jx11so3032992veb.7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Hw6KgiHPwPkCrekIIi/l2hDlZ1VbfMP9W87BxSJ61Lw=; b=ij3kgoUVXlzZMbAqmXlyAr57qOEPOvYBS5D7wXEWebd48Sj1ZtzLuV5eefSVv/5ZXq B/rk6JU/Pwg/xMJE95T5GbwRLdmXzM63jBZcdCFQX50O0AJ2F78W92dig4zkFwvsloV1 dwhbYarbLfhe+/lPFIjNDjugPUpNRNPb+UqPiSvhdbkd3jxYYudkWt0BUnw02Tnby86J hXkAxd01EY2vnHkcNm3JM5srVuMyuZ5jEYH5qdeqlkTqZSoXpIJwSzOizmuOBJ5NPTy2 JpKIpC1pY8KVoe0vyAfKgb0Z2e2TXnUCJD+oCZfvjhLf+3fgHadeGDuUFPFAkhJAX/XJ t/qQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4uAxBOJHKzYCKrgLbqZfuS1L8oUfcFy5Z+NFIsBOYL9CBimH5KLahVhoA60kxFNZyrmgMYDZC6KATE2Nw/9/H4BHcN/OpStQvfuzxU5EqwAd5xEODqYSP4qN0Ag1cbznO7M9li5k4L1afY4ZtlzEg0dXMvw==
X-Received: by 10.220.106.84 with SMTP id w20mr7924074vco.18.1392433689770; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.106.84 with SMTP id w20mr7924069vco.18.1392433689656; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.145.142 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFGoqUMGc0ojyGp3pMYGhuP+1K-uDJsX+=evXTz9AajcAT1Bhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140214211006.9831.91801.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFGoqUMGc0ojyGp3pMYGhuP+1K-uDJsX+=evXTz9AajcAT1Bhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:08:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL10_Brty3i8rTxhwfu2yZF_RtRCm=MGBmxwxn7WG5BCyMoWSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
To: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/338hTOY4UJsbCajMzNTbWeMILMU
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 03:08:14 -0000
Perhaps a quick question on section 6.2. I'm curious as to why there's a special case of "if there are no addresses, use All_DHCP_Relay_Agents_and_Servers"? If an administrator wanted the client to send to that address, they could also just supply that one address in the option. And then clients wouldn't have to have a special case handling of receiving an empty option. Also the section says "This list may include either multicast or unicast addresses." Is that intended to say that it cannot contain a mix of both? -- Andre Kostur
- [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dh… internet-drafts
- [dhcwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-ov… Marcin Siodelski
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv… Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv… Qi Sun
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv… Ted Lemon