Re: [dhcwg] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 03 February 2014 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649301A0170 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mEDVavxXZE2o for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072BC1A0140 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456E4880D1; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:30:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 10252516.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C778E1368158; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52EFB62E.90500@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:30:54 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
References: <52EBC3EA.1020104@innovationslab.net> <CFA19E62-0F9A-4358-AB7C-E4A910BF4874@nominum.com> <52EFA4E8.2040404@innovationslab.net> <D4ECE269-E79C-41A7-9AD1-82E04AB02432@nominum.com> <8ED0F0BC-B198-42C2-B725-A8CB77893278@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ED0F0BC-B198-42C2-B725-A8CB77893278@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wm6obDsQKS45jDd5hAHp8HjlkXQs6qxnu"
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:30:54 -0000

Hi Ralph,

On 2/3/14 10:06 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> 
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:48 AM 2/3/14, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

>>> If the pairing of a client and relay agent is not expected, this may not
>>> be an issue.
> 
> Perhaps I'm insufficiently caffeinated this AM, but I don't understand "pairing of a client and relay agent"...
> 

I meant having a client and relay agent functioning in the same box.

Brian