Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* dhc WG agenda

JiangSheng 66104 <shengjiang@huawei.com> Sat, 26 July 2008 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dhcwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D1D3A6ABB; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FCD3A6A0E for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uRVNd6RYzJwK for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga01-in.huawei.com (usaga01-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA143A6ABB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga01-in [172.18.4.6]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K4M002R7AEJ2I@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.17.1.36]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K4M00011AEHXO@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.1.3] (Forwarded-For: [130.129.64.64]) by szxmc04-in.huawei.com (mshttpd); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:18:06 +0800
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:18:06 +0800
From: JiangSheng 66104 <shengjiang@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4889C6F4.9070902@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Message-id: <f95bc2308556.8556f95bc230@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)
Content-language: en
Content-disposition: inline
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
References: <DC113ED5-44B8-4F3E-87EE-EA3855C0B558@cisco.com> <4889C6F4.9070902@piuha.net>
Cc: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Dhc Chairs <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* dhc WG agenda
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, Jari,

Yes, there is a DHCP relevant chartered item in CSI work group as I
quate below. However, it is quite different from this draft. The chartered
item in CSI is mainly about how to use CGA in DHCP-managed networks. It is
covered by my another draft:
www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jiang-sendcgaext-cga-config-02.txt

The current CSI charter does not cover securing DHCP with CGA. That's why I
submit this draft to DHC group. It is mainly adopting CGA to serve DHCP
for security purpose. It is extension of DHCP, not extension of CGA. I think
it is better to do this work in DHC WG rather than CSI. Based on the above
understanding, I did not request a time slot in CSI

"Develop an informational document analysing different approaches to
allow SeND and CGAs to be used in conjunction with DHCP, and making
recommendations on which are the best suited. Recharter based on the
result of the analysis."

Best regards,

Sheng

----- Original Message -----
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:28 pm
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* dhc WG agenda

> 
> >
> > Secure DHCPv6 using CGA                         S. Jiang         
> 10 
> > minutes
> >   <draft-jiang-dhc-Secure-DHCPv6-00>
> >   Initial WG review; accept as WG work item?
> 
> Note that we have another WG, CSI, whose charter has a work item on 
> securing DHCP with CGA. Or to be more exact, producing first a 
> design 
> analysis before actually picking a solution.
> 
> As a result, I don't think we want to adopt this document in the 
> DHC WG.
> 
> But don't take this as a suggestion to avoid the discussion! The 
> discussion on the list has been useful, and we should also talk 
> about it 
> in the meeting. Has a slot been requested from CSI?
> 
> Jari
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg