Re: [dhcwg] MTU option for DHCPv6?

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 27 July 2016 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED7612DC6F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6D65T4hqM60j for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA91912DD20 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=629; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469653318; x=1470862918; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=FkUOKYg46D5qrr/tPE3/oaZjAij4zwhyw4iJvf8tZT0=; b=jY0/iiQ4hlnKvYvsC/lhVEHZBAq1ZVYm/LMqU3wQsozKmLrnS635mf5x vTtL8ucDJ7m2/S7VCgx96uNmHyuLUe+YpB7CIKApL21EoTh4MJy16I7bC Ea6/29VvzT8zOIcefHNJzFR6G+g1UR8xo35M07Km/Mxb83eClXm7DmmJZ k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BRAgDsIJlX/5tdJa1dgz9WfAa4boF9J?= =?us-ascii?q?IV5AoE3OBQBAQEBAQEBXSeEXAEBBQEBODQXBAIBCBEEAQEfCQcnCxQJCAEBBAE?= =?us-ascii?q?SCIgpDrwaAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwWKd4IQiAsFmTEBjnSBXo1pj?= =?us-ascii?q?C2DdwEeNoN4bodBfwEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,431,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="302369006"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jul 2016 21:01:58 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6RL1wk7029028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:01:58 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:01:57 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:01:57 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: MTU option for DHCPv6?
Thread-Index: AdHoQoGGAMbjaqWBR9aaxP1yToT6sgAB2X5A
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:01:57 +0000
Message-ID: <5671d2f3bf364bec9b70ab8cbb9cd2a9@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <8c706ad593cc403d9e738c7aafec8360@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <8c706ad593cc403d9e738c7aafec8360@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.131.77.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/3VPsKmjMGdqFGFH6jIJey8CnjAk>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] MTU option for DHCPv6?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:02:13 -0000

Hi Fred:

Nothing has been proposed that I can recall. The issue really hasn't come up (to date).

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 4:10 PM
To: <dhcwg@ietf.org> <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [dhcwg] MTU option for DHCPv6?

Just curious - is there now (or has there ever been proposed) an MTU option for DHCPv6 in the same way that DHCPv4 has an MTU option?

Thanks - Fred

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg