IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 12 January 2007 22:37 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5V1O-00006p-ON; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:37:14 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5V1O-00006k-Cv for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:37:14 -0500
Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5V1N-0000kJ-3p for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:37:14 -0500
Received: from mail.nominum.com (mail.nominum.com [81.200.64.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09C556891; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:37:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.4 tests=AWL: -0.788,BAYES_99: 3.67,USER_IN_WHITELIST: -30, CUSTOM_RULE_FROM: ALLOW,TOTAL_SCORE: -27.118
X-Spam-Level:
Received: from [66.93.162.135] ([66.93.162.135]) (authenticated user mellon@nominum.com) by mail.nominum.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:37:10 -0800
Message-Id: <FF1C704C-7C87-4B33-BABA-D15D7A37ED1F@nominum.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig.venaas@uninett.no>
In-Reply-To: <45A4FB93.20500@uninett.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
X-Smtp-Server: mail.nominum.com:mellon
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v856)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG last calls on several WG documents
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:37:04 -0700
References: <EF2F0EC839870F43A6637360BC12ABD469673F@PACDCEXCMB05.cable.comcast.com> <45A4FB93.20500@uninett.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.856)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

On Jan 10, 2007, at 7:43 AM, Stig Venaas wrote:
> Please note that Ralph asked this to verify consensus
> for starting last calls. Based on the positive input we
> got for agentopt-delegate and srsn-option we started a
> last call for those. Once that is completed we will
> see if we now also got sufficient support for starting
> last calls on leasequery and ero.

I'm mildly uncomfortable with leasequery simply because it's a rather  
complex draft and I haven't had the time to sit down and try to  
implement it, so I'm worried that there are bugs in it.   Also, it  
seems to leave out discovering Prefix Delegations, which seems like a  
significant omission.   But with those caveats, I'm okay with it going  
forward to the next step, as long as we understand that it may need  
fixes if errors are discovered during implementation.   Possibly those  
can be folded in when the solution for Prefix Delegation is described.

I'm also fine with ERO going to last call.



_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status