IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] DHCP options 128-135 in use -- please place on "Tentatively Assigned" list re. RFC 3942

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 20 May 2005 21:40 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DZFEi-0002tv-2z; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:40:52 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DZFEg-0002tp-Ml for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:40:50 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16749 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:40:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DZFW5-0001mF-1K for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:58:52 -0400
Received: from [10.187.69.18] (m615e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.94.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76C35689B; Fri, 20 May 2005 14:39:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
In-Reply-To: <OF9464D80B.2D5D5D57-ON85257007.0060EA85-85257007.0061542E@mitel.com>
References: <OF9464D80B.2D5D5D57-ON85257007.0060EA85-85257007.0061542E@mitel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <9DF36697-99BE-4B43-B537-F40E93D5CA15@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP options 128-135 in use -- please place on "Tentatively Assigned" list re. RFC 3942
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:34:44 -0400
To: peter_blatherwick@mitel.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "Kostur, Andre" <akostur@incognito.com>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

On May 20, 2005, at 1:45 PM, peter_blatherwick@mitel.com wrote:
> Any feedback on 60 / 43?  Well deployed?  Well understood in the  
> real world?

The biggest tragedy of Option 60/43 is that so few client vendors  
implement it.   AFAIK all the server vendors implement it - to my  
knowledge, the Nominum server and the ISC server do, and I would be  
shocked if any of the other commercial servers don't.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status