Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DZFEi-0002tv-2z; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:40:52 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DZFEg-0002tp-Ml for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:40:50 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16749 for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:40:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DZFW5-0001mF-1K for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:58:52 -0400 Received: from [10.187.69.18] (m615e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.94.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76C35689B; Fri, 20 May 2005 14:39:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9DF36697-99BE-4B43-B537-F40E93D5CA15@nominum.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ted Lemon Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP options 128-135 in use -- please place on "Tentatively Assigned" list re. RFC 3942 Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:34:44 -0400 To: peter_blatherwick@mitel.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "Kostur, Andre" , "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org On May 20, 2005, at 1:45 PM, peter_blatherwick@mitel.com wrote: > Any feedback on 60 / 43? Well deployed? Well understood in the > real world? The biggest tragedy of Option 60/43 is that so few client vendors implement it. AFAIK all the server vendors implement it - to my knowledge, the Nominum server and the ISC server do, and I would be shocked if any of the other commercial servers don't. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg