Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 24 August 2016 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA1C12D182 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgCYpEhrpocV for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5D3127735 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f93so15856827lfi.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BE2JM+Zg5lFdSr4U0XKkD3JIXCcQLrnMujqb3evSiC8=; b=Io9CmO5LaKw7fosqge5ePp56T1gsOpaFAIPvQfDv7JlWeyvRIqHyzYoXqKen+6cf+C jhVjZzMqOk6BAp/qPHyoGTmOqCvry/n64wiZQ70qBZKMLhBS4D69H2gNnZJJfe8vxUHZ YVE+wLdJEuWixqdTQfhvFEMmBwg61ypG8UTTk/pyQBBS5mxWAhNFSNHTmddEbYyokDbm P2hCdLCRIz2cbYftTXiCuiI1fsYTTt69gFa6NCkvxXSvSJwDs1ZgzaG6h+pRnszY31LH KITAVWLviwHYIfJeFl9UtE/MsSH5zx8yyzXofK0k4LVeiYd3/H6rlOle9zIM2HZqRxg/ 0GGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BE2JM+Zg5lFdSr4U0XKkD3JIXCcQLrnMujqb3evSiC8=; b=mVOYG9otisquDKuvdh72qZB13BU2KbqcCZp0pYpz9i2gmHeD8d+cLIuA8zRU592A/1 /FYg7C89iLVAtzwbYashoc/XFFb1EPysgo9HdYSILOWAitMBFj51ECZSDonIJ5rOWLAY 24kFx8Ot7Z5tCidBEfzdBN9CVz82zO0rskbsQsiLuG5CNsmIQLNf5JwrOTO5UT+CPDV6 HUvDUleF260sLHeOyZsA3Hrqu2PfFQUBOSo/L36x9RJvZWF+PQafU+B1uh+y6HTPyFQI jnDG0g6nYY/cZgv1XX2bfch3j7RXQ84UVX+0HQG05LeIG/+edLNrplZu6AOHnOZqZDr2 zUXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwO7jxBTR2VlnMpVACfyJEdSH14d1Se+wRLiNpFOZdQwGFTQW86spyErJi4L+WjZXy2mrXh6kjy0bNwj0A==
X-Received: by 10.25.42.207 with SMTP id q198mr939683lfq.181.1472056101312; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <091180442e44490ba451874d1543f814@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <92dcf2e0cf08452caa5861f7258ea6c5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <201608121919.u7CJJqcS056876@givry.fdupont.fr> <c5303eef3c124228825f32a40f229107@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ccaff4d4cb5c4eefb05eee0660c2611c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <f46aa91e4cfb41b29dd2d8186f5959f8@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ba1c8ff573d7466b8c437373e05f1023@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <b65e1dd66b634240b3ca164b2c04c20a@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqfb5sxOpkTEXkwZXckKBWof7U1-W6EFzCHk7ijnMjpMMA@mail.gmail.com> <5ec83aaf4e76497aa4b4d465483bdcf5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqeKqEgLVC2ZZyUCjsrPP5_suRJ8en2NC+g13Q5PyQL1iw@mail.gmail.com> <30c9413c4662476096ef087ac88f6314@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <dc9d2c300d574732a12f7f366f6223c0@XCH15-05-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <3A5F0B79-8C76-4E82-97E9-FA63657DE6C3@cisco.com> <CAJ3w4NdjgVxvnvuaWjGM=qtOe0qUq4N96fVXsbNrf=YkhiABbQ@mail.gmail.com> <2f45b99b50f84b1280e92ad824e39e26@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <9E9A9543-ECB0-4D99-A00F-1AAD813B6522@fugue.com> <091180442e44490ba451874d1543f814@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:28:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=pD7TBrU_NnuyGz61+CiUVp0JiyLLfMUKTz_dgnO59QQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11411dba02314f053ad3c54b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/3po8F2yqm4zltUYlPGuUkxcwqGE>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:28:26 -0000

On Aug 24, 2016 12:23 PM, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
wrote:

> I think possibly so. If the server can feed the relay the IA_PD option
then
>
> all is well. In fact, I think this same issue would apply in any other
prefix
>
> delegation use case where the relay needs to inspect the IA_PD so it
>
> can inject routing information into the routing system.
>
>
>
> Am I understanding correctly?

Yes. This is the exact use model we need to address. Ralph Droms did some
work on it a few years ago but it never got off the ground. The work needs
to happen.