Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT

You will see some follow up mail from me on this draft today or tomorrow.

=========================================
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
m) +1-609-377-6594
e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com
o) +1-484-962-0060
w) http://www.comcast6.net
=========================================

On Sep 13, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Wuyts Carl wrote:

> Thx John,
> 
> Thing is that it get referred to from RFC6204, making it impossible for a CPE to meet the requirement of course.  We could take a proprietary option, but then every implementation would/could use a different number, which is to avoid I'd say.  In fact, this already happened before with DSLite option.  I've bumped into some implementation some time ago which was using a different number for the DSLite option, hence making the setup fail initially. 
> 
> Regs
> Carl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brzozowski, John [mailto:John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com] 
> Sent: woensdag 12 september 2012 21:29
> To: Wuyts Carl
> Cc: dhc WG
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT
> 
> Carl,
> 
> I do not think this is possible, I will check and get back to you unless someone beats me to it on the list.
> 
> John
> =========================================
> John Jason Brzozowski
> Comcast Cable
> m) +1-609-377-6594
> e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com
> o) +1-484-962-0060
> w) http://www.comcast6.net
> =========================================
> 
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Wuyts Carl wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Anyone an idea when an option number will be assigned for this oro (as it still says TBD in below draft) ?
>> (I-D.droms-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update)
>> 
>> Thx and regs
>> Carl
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 