From: Mathias Samuelson <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 -
 Respond by Feb. 28
Thread-Index: AQHPJ2k95y5WYkd6DUS92hnhNuKw4JrFaFWAgAq/xYA=
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:51:16 +0000
Message-ID: <2F6881F8-49B9-4CC0-A3B3-C20A496DF365@nominum.com>
References: <52FA8A40.8020703@gmail.com>
 <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9BF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9BF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BEE7E7477A1F8A4A9207BCD153BAFEA3@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/4d76xt05XcSgFjwYbuEGZh7aZJ0
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 -
 Respond by Feb. 28
Precedence: list

Unfortunately this is coming in late, but fwiw I've also read this document=
 and support advancing it.

Mathias

On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Reminder that this WGLC is outstanding.
>=20
> We need feedback in order to determine whether to advance this document.
>=20
> - Bernie
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: dhcwg
> Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Re=
spond by Feb. 28
>=20
> We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
> There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but we nev=
er saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors confidence in th=
ose proposals are high due to existing implementations, they have requested=
 WGLC.
>=20
> After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead with=
 the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
> Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A simple=
 "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the trick here.
>=20
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00. Please send =
your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very simi=
lar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
> If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft (v=
4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.
>=20
> Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do the=
 shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd for on=
e of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior IETF exper=
ience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight into the WGLC=
 process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such an experience c=
an be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.
>=20
> Bernie & Tomek
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg