[dhcwg] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-05: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 15:55 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security@ietf.org, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149304933098.25881.2630128409132458445.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:55:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/4hDqGDKCEZmspcot-jmbOFFLxa4>
Subject: [dhcwg] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-05: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on e-mail it seems like at least one company is implementing.

Personally, were I voting, I'd vote against making an MTI that I expect
almost nobody to follow, but I concede that that's not enough to hold a
discuss here.

[dhcwg] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla