Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 25 August 2016 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E25712D0A7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aohxaQ-Ut1x6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47BD12B040 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t7so57066989qkh.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=VmUmvp500Z+Rh9s9EplNdj6ZlwO5QIOM6UhkLqhFOss=; b=zR7VOM+uTeNEJIRKc5QDItKEH9eyjB1Mt9Bc2Ob1kAXNepWp6jU7wqfVZAekad6QQC 0qQKn/RzDU+57EXufCDd5KU0S/wnVBslX3tgB8gUjtCU0aRcHeHdXpUWGqs9h7eJtOIX Mu9bUP2WcoPm34NhQg//MEZm8agcY2+0UqBCYsx+I6TzpqfNqTOj1NID3Q0u6fwaUxcV Y8RuIhTvGkKm4DO3V2nUmfGEiYE+RH0qvu9TLzBleyXCggf2a2DDEbppaOm163YHNJz9 Os3WqNxKQcy3u4mJzWr0tmGJ4MPBBM4yigM3jJ3b1tN1eEf3qdHQIGOnp0VkwdkZB75R hxvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=VmUmvp500Z+Rh9s9EplNdj6ZlwO5QIOM6UhkLqhFOss=; b=M7zvHFOzSbn9G7dIiBEvUijWQF65/VJAfE43JMr4obf5MjR+anJBcycFn40xCd7S4+ xuPybD7CYZ2OYJZWLoagikW15e8QDjxUO5iS/Ptn5gFW7Z94RkWZoUDGKB1OdBbBFhnv f77gUl1GRhnlyvjh4fpedrS1IKi1nTp6kIc3IX+cV+qnzVbpIBNrQSHpQ31iEaebRWkH zCWRZY2t8Wel/jVXkLOvINopDlyyzSa9/auC7njdDY+pQrSqfPsbmYPNmM9gxLGtnxM8 ZGP9KcP7Ea8oH/zMKx9JxKhd6EDSvA6bW17KujI/13obieai8dVr/cHqKekuL9SwYMF3 nWog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPAtY4+zRUL+0KDFLo3jiE7N4god2wklChuM7LJ736A9AYo98hCm1gTGg59n3q2Jg==
X-Received: by 10.55.168.22 with SMTP id r22mr11746656qke.148.1472155593988; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (c-71-233-41-235.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [71.233.41.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m62sm8427595qke.13.2016.08.25.13.06.32 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CE00D403-0424-4DEB-B611-8212A4F2A689"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e4a009f8b6c42a9b359b6d704e12100@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:06:31 -0400
Message-Id: <17CB2C4C-807A-419C-98DB-333F95C2AFAD@fugue.com>
References: <92dcf2e0cf08452caa5861f7258ea6c5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <201608121919.u7CJJqcS056876@givry.fdupont.fr> <c5303eef3c124228825f32a40f229107@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ccaff4d4cb5c4eefb05eee0660c2611c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <f46aa91e4cfb41b29dd2d8186f5959f8@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ba1c8ff573d7466b8c437373e05f1023@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <b65e1dd66b634240b3ca164b2c04c20a@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqfb5sxOpkTEXkwZXckKBWof7U1-W6EFzCHk7ijnMjpMMA@mail.gmail.com> <5ec83aaf4e76497aa4b4d465483bdcf5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqeKqEgLVC2ZZyUCjsrPP5_suRJ8en2NC+g13Q5PyQL1iw@mail.gmail.com> <30c9413c4662476096ef087ac88f6314@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <dc9d2c300d574732a12f7f366f6223c0@XCH15-05-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <3A5F0B79-8C76-4E82-97E9-FA63657DE6C3@cisco.com> <CAJ3w4NdjgVxvnvuaWjGM=qtOe0qUq4N96fVXsbNrf=YkhiABbQ@mail.gmail.com> <2f45b99b50f84b1280e92ad824e39e26@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <9E9A9543-ECB0-4D99-A00F-1AAD813B6522@fugue.com> <091180442e44490ba451874d1543f814@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAPt1N1=pD7TBrU_NnuyGz61+CiUVp0JiyLLfMUKTz_dgnO59QQ@mail.gmail.com> <AF387F3E-1B64-4E5D-BAF7-EB5BF3ED1EB4@cisco.com> <55dcbc0cd1484fffa264b18b2fc3322c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <122453F6-3987-46D4-89EB-84AF99402BC3@cisco.com> <dd827ec92b874ad8a188b17f44392c54@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <438d610f19da4f7aa39fb70a7dc11513@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2279C5E3-0D51-4631-AFC9-DAF05339D21D@cisco.com> <d6f8ed9bdfc8461aa463e6542269ccda@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAPt1N1nTHJm44KR1SBg=ohj8HfKO+yLna+b+95FPocTjcuuwbQ@mail.gmail.com> <f3f1af6232194fb88703237bc55d8be3@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <9EE72F8D-6735-41BC-9F8F-579CA6537397@fugue.com> <4e4a009f8b6c42a9b359b6d704e12100@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/4zGjbV9b2sPpxDztK6tyTzHDVi4>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:06:36 -0000

On Aug 25, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> Where would we add this as an extension – rfc3315(bis)?

No, just define a new DHCP spec that says how to do what you need.