[dhcwg] WGLC Results for draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D6011E8151 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PED39DTuKyD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8053211E8145 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13572; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1374250805; x=1375460405; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=8sipRnKUPsz+ULybPU3HDvcz38KHUDSU2zLQ1yZJiAo=; b=LNNVCGc7gmeGJLrltcA5yf2OzAH9dKxP53nWGbyo8q06H3oLz82nVwwk qaBjMVc+IVGwSQowLGU7O9477qVQO2bOAr7wpHR/4xGkBLRUyaQf3PByw Ot0o7iDBvBNNvaT+HF9fsiQT4Kj9btUhbeimo6Emv+7Bvs2rb8PeY73nT Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmIFABFm6VGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABbgkJENVC4DYg8gRAWdIIkAQEBBB0QXgEZBAEBCx05FAkJAQQTCAGIBwyWMKBJjk0QgQE3gxFuA5kGkCSDEoFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,702,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="236999659"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2013 16:20:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6JGK42c024176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:20:04 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.56]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:20:04 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC Results for draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12
Thread-Index: Ac6Em3I0GX5nfeX5QBaddUv4K//Mag==
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:20:03 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185ED233@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.243.155]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185ED233xmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC Results for draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:20:10 -0000

Hi:

Based on my records, there appears to have only been one set of comments by Ralph, regarding the use of fragment/fragment types and referencing RFC 2131 (2132). See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg14476.html  (I and Ralph exchanged an email his issues too).

As this last call was just to confirm that recent changes were acceptable, I'll assume they are (excepting Ralph's comments), as we had an extensive review of the -11 document (via the WGLC).

The authors are asked to respond to Ralph's comments by either updating the draft (-13) or to indicate why they do not agree to Ralph's comments. And, once that is done I will initiate the write up and send this document to the IESG (via the AD).

Note: A -13 will of course need to wait until submissions reopen.


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:44 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC - draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12 - Respond by July 15


The draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12, addresses the comments from the previous (-11) last call. While originally I expected to have a short (1 week) last call for the updated document, I think it best to have the standard 2 weeks given the time of year (and the Independence Day holiday in the US).



Please review the draft and indicate whether or not you feel this version is ready to be published. Your response matters to the process, so please do respond.



Do note: While I encourage full reviews, the main focus is to assure we have consensus on the recent changes from the -11. The -11 WGLC support will be taken into consideration.



As Tomek is an author, I will evaluate consensus after July 15, 2013.



-          Bernie