Re: [dhcwg] [EXTERNAL] [v6ops] Re: Question to DHCPv6 Relay Implementors regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 15 October 2020 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222473A1176; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1r41byH9lQa; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C483A1178; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB0F38980; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:16:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pB6i2mReZ0dh; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:16:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90C23897F; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:16:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62946A5; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
cc: "Templin \(US\)\, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BD2B4938-B362-40A7-BCF7-DDA270A64BF7@gmail.com>
References: <5f119ffbb67245a9b9d34a0d8f7398f4@boeing.com> <10487.1602608586@localhost> <378d3420690246bbae253fb15be8c9a7@boeing.com> <19627.1602701863@localhost> <1b34b9bec59e4a00af8b9d8f182d23ff@boeing.com> <BD2B4938-B362-40A7-BCF7-DDA270A64BF7@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:10:48 -0400
Message-ID: <9357.1602720648@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/5m1eUR6kFew8uXZnPxLJKt6HNAA>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [EXTERNAL] [v6ops] Re: Question to DHCPv6 Relay Implementors regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:11:01 -0000

Bob, I think that this regards an issue fits between 6man and DHC.
I think that we are benefitting from the CC to 6man.
(in fact, that's how I noticed I was  no longer on the dhc list.)

Maybe v6ops does not belong.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide