[dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3736 (3796)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 11 November 2013 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3361821E8201 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:55:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2pWOJE6z+PO for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2EC21E8207 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0524C75E015; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:44:58 -0800 (PST)
To: rdroms@cisco.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, volz@cisco.com, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131111194458.0524C75E015@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:44:58 -0800
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3736 (3796)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:55:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3736, "Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Service for IPv6". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3736&eid=3796 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Section: 5.2 Original Text ------------- Client message: sent by a DHCP relay agent in a Relay-forward message to carry the client message to a server (section 20) Server message: sent by a DHCP server in a Relay-reply message to carry a response message to the relay agent (section 20) Corrected Text -------------- Relay Message: sent by a DHCP relay agent in a Relay-forward message to carry the client message to a server or sent by a DHCP server in a Relay-reply message to carry a response message to the relay agent (section 20) Notes ----- The correct name for the option carries in the Relay-forward message is "Relay Message". That potion is shared by both Relay-forward and Relay-reply messages to carry a DHCPv6 message from or to (respectively) a DHCPv6 client. I've marked this errata as "technical" because it might have an impact on implementations. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3736 (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Stateless Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Service for IPv6 Publication Date : April 2004 Author(s) : R. Droms Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Dynamic Host Configuration Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3736 (3796) RFC Errata System
- [dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3736 (3796) RFC Errata System