Re: [dhcwg] [ntpwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 02 December 2013 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7402F1ADFB1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:15:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocP82BLpPVFc for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0FA1ADFB0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:15:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D130A2383B6; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB52D160436; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97C6D16034F; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF773B04CC1; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:15:19 +1100 (EST)
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <529C1A31.2080900@ntp.org> <258D838F-F4BA-45D2-AA41-BB05E3AB147C@ogud.com> <529CA616.3010402@ntp.org> <19575403-444E-4CBA-8818-5F46328787AE@bsdimp.com> <E1VnZdi-0000fA-CY@stenn.ntp.org> <220ED02D-AE73-436F-A81F-BDF54611173B@bsdimp.com> <E1Vnb6D-0000lV-Gy@stenn.ntp.org> <20131202220311.85669B04BBE@rock.dv.isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:03:11 +1100." <20131202220311.85669B04BBE@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:15:19 +1100
Message-Id: <20131202221519.BF773B04CC1@rock.dv.isc.org>
Cc: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [ntpwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:15:37 -0000

In message <20131202220311.85669B04BBE@rock.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews writes:
> 
> The inception and expiration times in RRSIGs is specified as seconds
> since 00:00:00 Jan 1 1970 UTC excluding leap seconds modulo 2^32.
> 
> There are no recommended fudge factors to use when evaluating these
> times though named sets the expire time to 3600 seconds in the past

That should read "inception time to 3600 seconds in the past"

> by default when generating RRSIGs.  I believe the other signers do
> similar.  I've considered making the inception timestamp a whole
> day in the past to cope with badly set timezones.
> 
> The signature validity intervals are on the order of days.  Named
> defaults to 30 days.  They are regenerated about a week before they
> are due expire if not already regenerated due to zone content
> changes.  The records should expire from caches before they become
> invalid if re-signing is being done properly.
> 
> So if the validator and the signer are both within 30 minutes of
> the true time validation should succeed.
> 
> Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org